Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fairfield County

Court

Fairfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-14
Type T 02 Torts Defective Premises Private Snow Or Ice
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Vilma Jiatz Parent, Guardian Next Friend Of Kaylynne Canahui
Defendant Antoine Honorat|Nelta Honorat

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. AFFIDAVIT Action Not Lost
  7. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RESULT: Granted 3/11/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  8. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/11/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  9. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  10. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  11. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESULT: Denied 10/3/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  12. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/3/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  13. RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Objection to Motion for Summary Judgment
  14. NOTICE Notice of Service of Interrogatories and RFP, 5.30.24
  15. NOTICE of I & P request to defendants
  16. REPLY Reply to Plaintiff?s Objection to Summary Judgment
  17. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  18. NOTICE
  19. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 9/20/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/20/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  21. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Denied 10/3/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  22. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/3/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  23. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 8/14/2025 HON CHARLES REED
  24. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/14/2025 HON CHARLES REED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more