Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-02
Type Divorce With Minor Children
Docket 87 entries
Disposition SETTLED
Photo of Hon. Halley, David H

Judge

Hon. Halley, David H

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC INITIAL FILING.//PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  2. DIVORCE WITH MINOR CHILDREN
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  19. SUMMONS FEE (CLERKS FEE)
  20. SUMMONS AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ISSUED
  21. SIGNATURE PAGE FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PARENTING CLASSES//FILED
  22. PAUPER'S AFFIDAVIT//FILED
  23. PAUPER'S ON FILED FEES ASSESSED BEFORE FINAL ORDER IS ENTERED
  24. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE HALLEY, DAVID H TO THIS CASE.
  25. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
  26. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:FD-2024-569: AC01 CLERK FEES -$1.50
  27. RECEIPT # 2024-790285 ON 10/10/2024. PAYOR: HILLMAN/AMANDA TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 60.00. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-569: $58.50 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-569: $1.50 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS.
  28. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY FOR AN AGREED DECREE. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT IS PETITIONER IN PERSON PRO SE. RESPONDENT APPEARS NOT AFTER HAVING PROPERLY EXECUTED A NOTICE OF HEARING AND WAIVER OF APPEARANCE. PETITIONER IS SWORN AND TESTIMONY IS RECEIVED. TWO CHILDREN WERE BORN OF THE MARRIAGE, BUT LONG AFTER THE PARTIES SEPARATED. THE CHILDREN ARE NOT PETITIONER’S CHILDREN; HOWEVER, HIS PATERNITY MUST BE DISESTABLISHED. THIS HEARING IS CONTINUED SO THE CHILDREN’S PATERNITY CAN BE SETTLED. OKDHS CSS STACIE DILLARD-SELF WILL BE CONSULTED FOR ANY OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PATERNITY. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  29. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION//FILED
  30. DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  31. JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF NON-PARENTAGE//FILED
  32. ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENTS AND/OR CASE//FILED *TOTALLY SEAL FROM PUBLIC VIEW: JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF NON-PARENTAGE
  33. MOTION TO SETTLE//FILED
  34. MOTION TO COMPEL//FILED
  35. CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE//FILED
  36. TEMPORARY ORDER//FILED
  37. HANDWRITTEN ORDER//FILED
  38. MOTION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY CHILD CUSTODY//FILED
  39. MOTION TO DISMISS EMERGENCY FILING FOR MOOTNESS//FILED
  40. HANDWRITTEN ORDER//FILED
  41. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY UPON RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY CHILD CUSTODY. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT ARE PETITIONER IN PERSON WITH MITCHELL MCCARTHY AND RESPONDENT IN PERSON PRO SE. THE COURT HEARS TESTIMONY AND ARGUMENT FROM ALL. RESPONDENT’S MOTION WAS BASED ON PETITIONERS’ IMPENDING EVICTION IN RESPONSE TO WHICH SHE REQUESTED TEMPORARY SOLE CUSTODY WITH LIMITED VISITATION TO PETITIONER, SPECIFICALLY 8-HOURS SUPERVISED/1X/WEEK. TODAY BECAUSE PETITIONER AND HIS ATTORNEY ASSURE THE COURT THAT PETITIONER HAS SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATED WITH HIS LANDLORD TO PREVENT EVICTION, THE COURT FINDS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUSTAIN RESPONDENT’S MOTION AND IT IS DENIED ON THAT BASIS. THE COURT INFORMS EVERYONE THAT SHOULD PETITIONER BE EVICTED DESPITE HIS CONTRARY ASSURANCE; THE COURT WILL CONSIDER HIS HOMELESSNESS AN EMERGENCY DIRECTLY AND NEGATIVELY AFFECTING THE CHILDREN’S BEST INTERESTS FOR CUSTODY AND VISITATION PURPOSES. THE COURT ADMONISHES BOTH PARTIES TO SPEAK FAVORABLY (OR NOT AT ALL) ABOUT THE OTHER PARENT WHEN THE CHILDREN ARE PRESENT. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  42. EARLY SETTLEMENT MEDIATION REPORT TO REFERRING COURT//FILED **MEDIATION DATE 01/30/2025
  43. MOTION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY CHILD CUSTODY//FILED
  44. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY FOR RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY CUSTODY. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT ARE PETITIONER IN PERSON WITH HIS ATTORNEY ERIC STROCEN, RESPONDENT IN PERSON PRO SE. THE COURT ADVISES PETITIONER THAT HE IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT MAY INCRIMINATE HIMSELF AND HIS SILENCE REGARDING RESPONDENT’S ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM WILL NOT BE USED AGAINST HIM. THE COURT HEARS TESTIMONY AND ARGUMENT FROM BOTH PARTIES AND REVIEWS TEXT COMMUNICATIONS ON RESPONDENT’S CELL PHONE. THE COURT FINDS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUSTAIN RESPONDENT’S MOTION AND IT IS DENIED ON THAT BASIS. THE COURT ORDERS THE PARTIES TO SECURE A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IN FURTHERANCE OF THIS COURT’S ORDER UPON RESPONDENT’S OCTOBER 2024 REQUEST. THE COURT ALLOWS ERIC STROCEN AND MITCHELL MCCARTHY TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER. ATTEMPTS TO SECURE MEDIATION HAVE FAILED IN THE ABSENCE OF A GUARDIAN AD LITEM. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  45. MOTION TO WITHDRAW//FILED
  46. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL//FILED
  47. AFFIDAVIT//FILED
  48. APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT//FILED
  49. APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT//FILED
  50. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND WRIT OF ASSISTANCE//FILED
  51. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY UPON PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT ARE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT IN PERSON PRO SE. ALSO APPEARING ARE MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER CAROLINE PIERCE AND MATERNAL STEP-GRANDFATHER JASON HEARN. LATER IN THE PROCEEDING PETITIONER’S GIRLFRIEND LAUREN WEBER AND PATERNAL GRANDMOTHER EMILY PILAND ARE ALLOWED INTO THE COURTROOM. THE COURT HEARS ARGUMENT FROM BOTH PARTIES ABOUT PETITIONER’S APPLICATION. THE COURT FINDS THE EVIDENCE INSUFFICIENT TO WARRANT THIS EXTRAORDINARY EMERGENCY ACTION. PETITIONER’S APPLICATION IS DENIED. THE COURT MODIFIES THE CHILDREN’S VISITATION EXCHANGE LOCATION FROM THE BANK TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT CLOSEST TO THE DELIVERING PARENT – RESPONDENT WILL DELIVER THE CHILDREN TO THE MUSTANG PD WHEN IT IS PETITIONER’S VISITATION POINT. PETITIONER WILL DELIVER THE CHILDREN TO THE YUKON PD WHEN IT IS RESPONDENT’S VISITATION POINT. THE COURT CLARIFIES THAT THE PARENT WITH THE CHILDREN MAKES THE DECISIONS FOR THE CHILDREN DURING THEIR WINDOW OF PHYSICAL CUSTODY. THE COURT COMMANDS THE PARENTS TO ALWAYS EXCHANGE ERS WITH HER MEDICATION. REGARDLESS OF THEIR DISPUTES, ERS IS ALWAYS TO HAVE HER MEDICINE. RESPONDENT IS WORRIED ABOUT PETITIONER’S LIVING SITUATION. PETITIONER INFORMS THE COURT HE HAS SECURED A NEW LIVING SPACE AND WILL BE LEAVING HIS CURRENT RESIDENCE SOON. WITHOUT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A REASONABLE SUSPICION OF CURRENT USE, THE COURT DENIES RESPONDENT’S REQUEST FOR URINALYSIS TESTING FOR PETITIONER AND LAUREN WEBER. THE COURT DIRECTS PETITIONER TO CONDUCT HIS BUSINESS IN THIS MATTER, WITHOUT DELEGATING TO LAUREN WEBER. THE COURT ADMONISHES LAUREN WEBER AGAINST OUTBURSTS TO COURTHOUSE STAFF AND OFFICES. THE COURT AGAIN ADMONISHES THE PARTIES TO LIMIT THEIR COMMUNICATION WITH EACH OTHER TO OFW. THE COURT AGAIN ENCOURAGES THE PARTIES TO PARTICIPATE IN MEDIATION. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  52. EARLY SETTLEMENT MEDIATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING//FILED
  53. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY FOR REVIEW. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT ARE PETITIONER PRO SE AND RESPONDENT PRO SE. THE COURT IS INFORMED THAT THE PARTIES SUCCESSFULLY MEDIATED THEIR DISPUTES. THE COURT REFERS THEM TO SUZANNE GRIMES FOR ADVICE ABOUT FINALIZING A DECREE. THE PARTIES WERE ADVISED TO CONTACT THE COURT IF/WHEN SUBSEQUENT HEARINGS ARE REQUIRED. JUDGE DEWEY
  54. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY PURSUANT TO AN AGREED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT APPEAR PRO SE. THE PARTIES ARE SWORN, AND TESTIMONY IS RECEIVED. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED DECREE THAT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY BOTH PARTIES. THE COURT APPROVES THE DECREE AND GRANTS THE PARTIES A DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF INCOMPATIBILITY. THE COURT APPROVES THE DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND FINDS THEY ARE EQUITABLE AS EVIDENCED BY THE PARTIES’ SIGNATURES AND VERBAL ASSENT. TWO MINOR CHILDREN WERE BORN OF THE MARRIAGE. THE COURT APPROVES THE ATTACHED JOINT CUSTODY PLAN, PER THE AGREEMENT OF BOTH PARTIES, IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE MINOR CHILDREN. THE COURT APPROVES THE CHILD SUPPORT COMPUTATION, WHICH IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE GUIDELINES AND IS ATTACHED TO THE DECREE. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  55. DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  56. NOTICE OF REDIRECTION OF SUPPORT PAYMENTS//FILED
  57. CRT MIN. COURT THIS DAY REVIEWS PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY CUSTODY. IT IS VERIFIED BY PETITIONER AND ACCOMPANIED BY TEXT MESSAGES PRESUMABLY BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND CELL PHONE CALL LOGS. THE TEXT MESSAGES ALLUDE TO A DHS INVESTIGATION ABOUT A MAN NAMED, “JASON”. OHS CONVEYED TO RESPONDENT JASON’S UNFITNESS AND RESPONDENT VERBALIZED HER INTENTION TO KEEP THE CHILDREN AWAY FROM HIM AND THE MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER. INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE COURT TO ESTABLISH A THREAT OF IMMINENT HARM BEFALLING THE CHILDREN IF LEFT IN THE CARE OF EITHER PARENT PURSUANT TO THE CUSTODY AGREEMENT. PETITIONER WILL BE ADVISED TO CONTACT HIS LAWYER AND/OR FILE A MOTION TO MODIFY CUSTODY IF HE SO CHOOSES. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  58. MOTION TO ENFORCE VISITATION//FILED
  59. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  60. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  61. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  62. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  63. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  64. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  65. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  66. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  67. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  68. NOTICE OF HEARING//FILED
  69. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
  70. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:FD-2024-563: AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE -$0.25FD-2024-563: AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND -$0.63FD-2024-563: AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND -$0.03FD-2024-563: AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS -$0.02FD-2024-563: AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND -$0.04FD-2024-563: AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES -$0.13FD-2024-563: AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND -$0.02FD-2024-563: AC01 CLERK FEES -$0.80
  71. RECEIPT # 2025-816646 ON 07/03/2025. PAYOR: PRUETT/EVELYN TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 76.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-563: $32.20 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-563: $1.92 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS. FD-2024-563: $0.64 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-563: $4.87 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-563: $1.51 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-563: $0.43 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-563: $0.95 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-563: $24.37 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-563: $9.75 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  72. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY UPON RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE VISITATION. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT WERE BOTH PARTIES PRO SE IN THIS POST-DECREE MATTER. THE COURT HEARS ARGUMENT FROM BOTH PARENTS. THE COURT AND PARTIES AGREE THE CURRENT VISITATION SCHEDULE DOES NOT WORK GIVEN RESPONDENT’S CURRENT WORK SCHEDULE. COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: - IF RESPONDENT’S SHIFT ENDS AT 8:00 PM, THEN CHILD EXCHANGE NEXT MORNING AT 8:00 AM. – IF RESPONDENT’S SHIFT ENDS AT 7:00 AM, THEN CHILD EXCHANGE SAME MORNING AT 8:00 AM. – IF RESPONDENT’S SHIFT BEGINS AT 7:00 AM, THEN CHILD EXCHANGE AT YUKON POLICE DEPARTMENT AT 6:15 AM. PARTIES TO MEDIATE 1) RESPONDENT’S MAKE-UP VISITATION – 8 VISITS TO RESPONDENT. 2) PARTIES TO DEVELOP WORKABLE VISITATION SCHEDULE REMEMBERING TO PRIORITIZE THE CHILDREN’S STABILITY. SCHEDULES ARE NEEDED FOR SUMMER, HOLIDAY, AND SCHOOL YEAR. BOTH PARTIES SIGN THE COURT’S ORDER AS TO FORM. PETITIONER OBJECTS TO EARLY MORNING EXCHANGES. RESPONDENT OBJECTS TO EXCHANGES NOT AT THE EL RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  73. HANDWRITTEN ORDER//FILED
  74. NOTICE OF DOCKETING OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER/NOTICE//FILED
  75. MOTION TO MODIFY CHILD CUSTODY FILED
  76. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  77. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  78. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  79. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  80. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  81. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  82. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  83. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  84. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  85. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED
  86. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
  87. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:FD-2024-563: AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE -$0.25FD-2024-563: AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND -$0.63FD-2024-563: AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND -$0.03FD-2024-563: AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS -$0.02FD-2024-563: AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND -$0.04FD-2024-563: AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES -$0.13FD-2024-563: AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND -$0.02FD-2024-563: AC01 CLERK FEES -$1.05

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more