Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-11
Status Stay
Type 37 Unlimited Other Contract
Docket 201 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rodriguez, Eduardo|Rodriguez Gomez, Santiago|View Document 11.25.24 S Opposition To Defendants Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 12.3.24 Reply To 's Opposition To Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 12.3.24 Reply To S' Opposition To Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 11.25.24 S Opposition To Defendants Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 12.3.24 Reply To 's Opposition To Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 12.3.24 Reply To S' Opposition To Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings
Defendant Jawad Co.|First Technology Federal Credit Union|Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company|View Document 11.25.24 Plaintiffs Opposition To S Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 11.25.24 Compendium Of Exhibits Iso Opposition To S Motion To Compel Arbitration|View Document 11.25.24 Plaintiffs Opposition To S Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings|View Document 11.25.24 Compendium Of Exhibits Iso Opposition To S Motion To Compel Arbitration
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  15. View Document -Affidavit of venue
  16. Comment Affidavit of venue
  17. Summons issued and filed
  18. View Document -Summons
  19. Notice of Hearing
  20. View Document - Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes
  21. Comment Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes (Emailed)
  22. Proof of Service
  23. View Document Proof of Service of Summons
  24. Proof of Service
  25. View Document Proof of Service of Summons
  26. Proof of Service
  27. View Document Proof of Service of Summons
  28. Summons and Complaint
  29. Served
  30. Comment and Statement of Damages
  31. Summons and Complaint
  32. Served
  33. Comment and Statement of Damages
  34. Summons and Complaint
  35. Served
  36. Comment and Statement of Damages
  37. Proof of Service
  38. View Document Proof of Service
  39. Comment Proof of Service
  40. Answer Filed
  41. View Document Answer to Complaint
  42. Transfer of Fees Completed
  43. Comment For WEB-2024-21809
  44. Case Management Statement Filed
  45. View Document 4-23-24 Case Management Statement
  46. Comment HRG
  47. Case Management Statement Filed
  48. View Document 4-24-24 Case Management Statement
  49. Comment HRG
  50. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  51. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  52. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  53. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  54. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  55. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  56. View Document - Proposed Remote Appearance Order Received
  57. View Document - Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  58. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  59. Comment Party: Brooke A. Brigham Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  60. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  61. View Document - Notice of Remote Appearance
  62. Comment Party: Brooke A. Brigham Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  63. Proof of Service
  64. View Document - Proof of Service
  65. Comment Re: Notice of Remote Appearance; Order Regarding Remote Appearance
  66. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  67. Comment Emailed to: [email protected]
  68. Case Management Conference
  69. Original Type Case Management Conference
  70. Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel
  71. Hearing Time 3:00 PM
  72. Result Heard
  73. Minute Order Attachment
  74. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  75. Jury Requested by Party
  76. Referral to ADR
  77. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall
  78. Comment Attorney S Ratliff and Attorney B Brigham appearing on behalf of Attorney G Babbitt and Attorney A Kamarei
  79. Notice Filed
  80. View Document Notice of Appearance of Lead Counsel
  81. Comment Notice of Appearance of Lead Counsel
  82. Notice Filed
  83. View Document Notice Filed
  84. Comment Notice of Dept Change Only from 402 to 97E
  85. ADR Stipulation Mediation filed
  86. View Document ADR Stipulation
  87. Comment Parties to engage in mediation. Mediator: Alan M Simpson
  88. Notice of Motion
  89. View Document Motion to Compel Arbitration HRG
  90. Comment Motion to Compel Arbitration
  91. Declaration Filed
  92. View Document GFO Dec re Motion to Compel Arbitration HRG
  93. Comment Declaration of G. Olives re Motion to Compel Arbitration
  94. Declaration Filed
  95. View Document MJ Dec re Motion to Compel Arbitration HRG
  96. Comment Declaration of Jawad re Motion to Compel Arbitration
  97. Proof of Service
  98. View Document POS re Motion to Compel Arbitration
  99. Comment Proof of Service
  100. Notice Filed
  101. View Document Notice of Appearances of new Lead Attorney
  102. Comment Notice of Appearances of new Lead Attorney
  103. OSC - ADR Stipulation
  104. Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G
  105. Hearing Time 3:02 PM
  106. Cancel Reason Off Calendar
  107. Association of Attorney filed
  108. View Document Association of Counsel
  109. Comment Law Offices of John L. Fallat - Associated
  110. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  111. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance
  112. Comment Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  113. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  114. View Document Notice of Appearance
  115. Comment Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  116. Proof of Service
  117. View Document Proof of Service
  118. Comment RE: notice of remote appearance
  119. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  120. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  121. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  122. Hearing Time 5:32 PM
  123. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  124. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  125. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  126. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  127. Hearing Time 5:32 PM
  128. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  129. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  130. View Document Proposed Order RE: Notice of Appearance - Auto Legal Group
  131. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  132. Comment Party: Jawad Co.; First Technology Federal Credit Union; Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  133. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  134. View Document Proposed Order regarding Remote Appearance - Auto Fraud Legal Center
  135. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  136. Comment Party: Rodriguez, Eduardo; Rodriguez Gomez, Santiago Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  137. Order Received for Signature
  138. View Document Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Continuance
  139. Comment *Order signed and forwarded to the Clerk's Office on for further processing* FWD: D501 - Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Continuance of Defendants, Jawad Co., First Technology Federal Credit Union, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Companys Motion to Compel Arbitration (Orders)
  140. Stipulation and Order filed
  141. View Document 10-29-24 Stipulation and Order filed
  142. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  143. Comment continue Motion to compel arbitration to
  144. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  145. Comment Mailed/Emailed to: [email protected]
  146. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  147. Comment Mailed/Emailed to: [email protected]; [email protected]
  148. Notice Filed
  149. View Document 10-30-24 Notice of Entry of Order
  150. Comment of Entry of Order
  151. Opposition filed
  152. View Document 11.25.24 Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  153. Comment Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Jawad Co, First Technology Federal Credit Union, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  154. Declaration Filed
  155. View Document 11.25.24 Declaration of Christopher P. Barry iso Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration
  156. Comment Declaration of Christopher P. Barry in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Jawad Co, First Technology Federal Credit Union and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  157. Declaration Filed
  158. View Document 11.25.24 Declaration of Kaylin M. Masis iso Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration
  159. Comment Declaration of Kaylin M. Masis in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Jawad Co, First Technology Federal Credit Union, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  160. Trial brief filed
  161. View Document 11.25.24 Compendium of Exhibits iso Opposition to Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration
  162. Comment Compendium of Exhibits in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Jawad Co, First Technology Federal Credit Union, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  163. Proof of Service
  164. View Document 11.25.24 Proof of Service
  165. Reply filed
  166. View Document 12.3.24 Reply To Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  167. Comment Reply To Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  168. Declaration Filed
  169. View Document 12.3.24 Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  170. Comment Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings
  171. Proof of Service
  172. View Document 12.3.24 Proof of Service
  173. Petition - Compel Arbitration
  174. Original Type Petition - Compel Arbitration
  175. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  176. Hearing Time 3:27 PM
  177. Result Uncontested
  178. Comment Glen Olives - filed
  179. Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only)
  180. View Document Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only)
  181. Comment with certificate of mailing
  182. Notice or Order Staying Action
  183. Comment Per Min. Order
  184. Notice of Hearing
  185. View Document GN-23 Notice of Calendar Setting
  186. View Document GN-23 Notice of Calendar Setting
  187. Comment ASC HRG Dept. 501 3:30pm
  188. Arbitration Status Conference
  189. Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler
  190. Hearing Time 3:28 PM
  191. Mandatory Settlement Conference
  192. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
  193. Cancel Reason Case Stayed
  194. Trial Readiness
  195. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  196. Hearing Time 9:30 AM
  197. Cancel Reason Case Stayed
  198. Jury Trial
  199. Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M
  200. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  201. Cancel Reason Case Stayed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more