Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-13
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 113 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Carrillo Fernandez, Guadalupe R
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Proof of Service
  4. Comment Served: Guadalupe R Carrillo Fernandez / Sub Service
  5. Answer Filed Family Support
  6. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  7. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Answer was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Department of Child Support Services P.O.Box 12946 Fresno, Ca.93779-2946
  8. Notice of Motion
  9. Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Join other Parent / Hrg: @ 8am Dept 302
  10. Proof of Service by Mail
  11. Comment Date mailed: Served: Guadalupe R Carrillo Fernandez & Cinthya Sanchez Guzman
  12. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  13. Comment Party: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  14. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  15. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  16. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  17. Hearing Time 4:00 PM
  18. Result Heard
  19. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  20. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  21. Comment Party: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  22. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  23. Comment Emailed to: [email protected]
  24. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  25. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  26. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  27. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  28. Result Heard
  29. Comment Resp auth Zoom
  30. Motion Child Support
  31. Original Type Motion Child Support
  32. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  33. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  34. Result Heard
  35. Motion - Health Care
  36. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  37. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  38. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  39. Result Heard
  40. Motion - Joinder
  41. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  42. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  43. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  44. Result Heard
  45. Comment Join other Parent
  46. Respondent: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R
  47. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  48. Appeared in Person
  49. Proof of Service by Mail
  50. Comment Served Respondent by Mail
  51. Response to Governmental Notice of Motion
  52. Comment Response to Governmental NOM or OSC/Hrg Date: @8am Dept:302
  53. Motion Filed
  54. Comment Request For Hearing and Application To Cancel (set aside)Voluntary Declaration of Parentage or Paternity-W/ Declaration/Hrg Date: @8am Dept:302
  55. Proof of Service by Mail
  56. Comment DCSS served by mail with Respondent's responsive declaration and RFO, with additional copy for Cinthya Sanchez
  57. Notice of Remote Appearance.
  58. Comment Party: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  59. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  60. Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance
  61. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  62. Hearing Time 4:00 PM
  63. Result Heard
  64. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted
  65. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  66. Comment Party: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  67. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance
  68. Comment Emailed to: Guadalupe Carrillo Fernandez - Zoom Link Included
  69. Motion Child Support
  70. Original Type Motion Child Support
  71. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  72. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  73. Result Continued Party's Motion
  74. Comment ***Spanish Resp***Cont from to allow Resp to seek legal counsel/Disputes parentage for child Santiago/RJ 3/1/24/Temp order in place $846/Resp auth to appear via Zoom but will be assisted via phone by interpreter
  75. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  76. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  77. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  78. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  79. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  80. Result Continued Party's Motion
  81. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  82. Appeared in Person
  83. Proof of Service by Mail
  84. Comment Served: Guadalupe R Carrillo Fernandez. Mailed on
  85. Responsive Declaration
  86. Comment to RFO / HRG: @ 8AM Dept 302
  87. Proof of Service by Mail
  88. Comment Date mailed: Served: Guadalupe R Carrillo Fernandez & Cinthya Sanchez Guzman
  89. Set Aside Voluntary Paternity
  90. Original Type Set Aside Voluntary Paternity
  91. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  92. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  93. Result Heard
  94. Respondent: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R
  95. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  96. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  97. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  98. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  99. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  100. Result Heard
  101. Comment cont'd from to be heard w/ Resp Set Aside VDP / Spanish both parties
  102. Respondent: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R
  103. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  104. Motion Child Support
  105. Original Type Motion Child Support
  106. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  107. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  108. Result Heard
  109. Respondent: CARRILLO FERNANDEZ, GUADALUPE R
  110. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  111. Appeared in Person
  112. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall
  113. Confidential document filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more