Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Litchfield County

Court

Litchfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-07
Type T 11 Torts Defective Premises Public Snow Or Ice
Docket 63 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Michael Sweeney
Defendant City Of Torrington|Torrington Board Of Education

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant, Torrington BOE's M-Strike and MOL iso M-Strike
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE
  7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 4/18/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  8. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/18/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  9. NOTICE of service of discovery on plaintiff
  10. NOTICE Notice of Standard Discovery (forms 203 & 206 Premise) - to Defendant
  11. REQUEST TO REVISE
  12. REVISED COMPLAINT
  13. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 7/30/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  14. ORDER RESULT: Off 5/22/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  15. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 7/30/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  16. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 7/29/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  17. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/29/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  18. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Accepted 6/5/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  19. ORDER RESULT: Accepted 6/5/2024 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  20. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9)
  21. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  22. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  23. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & supporting Memorandum of Law RESULT: Order 10/17/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  24. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/17/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  25. EXHIBITS Re Motion for Summary Judgment (No. 112.00)
  26. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  27. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  28. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 5/5/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  29. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/5/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  30. OBJECTION Partial Objection/Response Re Motion for Extension of Time (No. 116.00)
  31. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Denied 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  32. ORDER RESULT: Denied 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  33. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5
  34. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY REQUESTS PB SEC 13-9(a) Motion for Permission to File Supplemental Non-Standard Requests for Production RESULT: Denied 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  35. ORDER RESULT: Denied 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  36. OBJECTION Re Second Motion for Extension of Time (No. 118.00) to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Sustained 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  37. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  38. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 6/11/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  39. OBJECTION Re Motion for Permission to File Non-Standard Discovery (No. 120.00) RESULT: Sustained 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  40. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 6/18/2025 HON ANN LYNCH
  41. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/24/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  42. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES Revised Scheduling Order RESULT: Accepted 7/1/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  43. ORDER RESULT: Accepted 7/1/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  44. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  45. MOTION TO CITE ADDITIONAL PARTY RESULT: Order 10/27/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  46. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/27/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  47. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/27/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  48. OBJECTION Re Motion to Cite Additional Party (No. 127.00)
  49. REPLY Reply to Defendant's Objection To Cite Additional Party
  50. OBJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Motion for Summary Judgment w/Exhibits
  51. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  52. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  53. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/27/2025 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  54. REPLY MEMORANDUM Re Objection (No. 130.00) to Motion for Summary Judgment (No. 112.00)
  55. EXHIBITS Re Reply Memorandum (No. 134.00)
  56. AMENDED COMPLAINT AS SERVED
  57. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 1/21/2026 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  58. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/21/2026 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  59. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SCHEDULING ORDER
  60. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 2/18/2026 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  61. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/18/2026 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  62. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/20/2026 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  63. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/20/2026 HON ANDREW RORABACK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more