Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-03
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 38 entries

Parties

Plaintiff U.s. Bank National Association C/o Levy & Associates
Defendant Tyson Nguyen
Photo of Hon. William T McGinty

Judge

Hon. William T McGinty

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54763324) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TYSON NGUYEN 4894 AUTUMN LN BROOKLYN, OH 44144
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54763323) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN A. SWOSINSKI [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54763322) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN A. SWOSINSKI [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54763321) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: F. PETER COSTELLO [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54763320) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: F. PETER COSTELLO [email protected]
  7. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT ON 7/10/2024, THE PLAINTIFF WAS GRANTED ADDITIONAL TIME TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. AS OF 9/9/2024, NO FURTHER ATTEMPTS AT SERVICE HAVE BEEN MADE. THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO THIS COURT'S ORDER OF 7/10/2024, AND CIV.R. 41(B) FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 09/11/2024 AT 11:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  9. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  10. CASE CALLED FOR CMC ON 7/9/2024. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. PLAINTIFF'S ORAL REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO PERFECT SERVICE IS GRANTED. CMC CONTINUED TO 9/11/2024 AT 11:30 A.M. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE BY THAT DATE WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 09/11/2024 AT 11:30 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES AND THEN CONTACT THE COURT AT (216) 443-8601. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 53677045 ADDRESSED TO TYSON NGUYEN(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  12. TELEPHONE CMC OF 5/2/2024 IS CANCELLED AS SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN PERFECTED ON DEFENDANT. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 07/09/2024 AT 11:00 AM. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BY THIS DATE MAY RESULT IN THE CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL INITIATE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES AND THEN CONTACT THE COURT AT (216) 443-8601. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 05/02/2024 AT 10:15 AM IS CANCELLED.
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(53677045) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TYSON NGUYEN 10705 LINNET AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44111-0000
  15. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. WRIT FEE
  17. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE TO REISSUE SERVICE
  18. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FAILED ON 2/1/2024. NO FURTHER ATTEMPTS AT SERVICE HAVE BEEN MADE. PLAINTIFF TO REQUEST NEW SERVICE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN THE CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR NGUYEN/TYSON/ 04/09/2024 17:01:00
  20. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR DUPLAY/CRYSTAL/M 04/09/2024 17:01:00
  21. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/02/2024 AT 10:15 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL, OR PLAINTIFF IF PROCEEDING PRO SE, SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL AND CONTACT THE COURT AT (216) 443-8601. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING MATTERS.
  22. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 04/09/2024 AT 10:45 AM IS CANCELLED.
  23. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR NGUYEN/TYSON/ 03/18/2024 17:01:07
  24. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR DUPLAY/CRYSTAL/M 03/18/2024 17:01:07
  25. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/09/2024 AT 10:45 AM. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL, OR PLAINTIFF IF PROCEEDING PRO SE, SHALL INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL AND CONTACT THE COURT AT (216) 443-8601. PARTIES SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING MATTERS.
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52704150 RETURNED 01/25/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT NGUYEN/TYSON/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52704150 RETURNED 1/25/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT NGUYEN/TYSON/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. SUMS COMPLAINT(52704150) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TYSON NGUYEN 4894 AUTUMN LN BROOKLYN, OH 44144
  29. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  30. WRIT FEE
  31. JUDGE WILLIAM T MCGINTY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  32. LEGAL RESEARCH
  33. LEGAL NEWS
  34. LEGAL AID
  35. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  36. COMPUTER FEE
  37. CLERK'S FEE
  38. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID CRYSTAL M DUPLAY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more