Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-05
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 98 entries

Parties

Plaintiff U.s. Bank National Association
Defendant Jason B. Zaptocky|Jane Doe, Name Unknown, Unknown Spouse Of Jason B. Zaptocky, (if Any)|John Doe,unknown Heirs, Beneficiaries And Unknown Spouse Of Dorothy L. Eckerfield And Unknown Spouses And Creditors; And, Unknown Spouse Of Dorothy L. Eckerfield|The United States Of America The Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721326) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721325) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JASON B. ZAPTOCKY 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721324) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CARLA M. ALLEN [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721323) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KRISTEN E FRIEDMAN [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721322) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721321) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721320) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721319) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  10. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721318) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721317) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  12. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721316) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KAREN E. SWANSON HAAN [email protected]
  13. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721315) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KAREN E. SWANSON HAAN [email protected]
  14. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721314) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KAREN E. SWANSON HAAN [email protected]
  15. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721313) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  16. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721312) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  17. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721311) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KIMBERLY FULKERSON [email protected]
  18. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721310) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  19. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721309) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  20. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721308) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  21. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53721307) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  22. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2), FILED 04/16/2024, IS GRANTED. CASE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2) 05/02/2024 - GRANTED
  24. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984053 RETURNED 02/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. ANSWER FILED BY D4 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATTORNEY KAREN E. SWANSON HAAN 0082518 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984052 RETURNED 02/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ZAPTOCKY/JASON/B. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984054 RETURNED 02/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE,UNKNOWN HEIRS, BENEFICIARIES AND - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. SUGGESTION OF DEATH FILED BY P1 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 SUGGESTION OF DEATH
  29. LEGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  30. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED $330.80 - LEGAL NEWS FEE $250.00
  31. PRE-PAID PORTION OF SERVICE PUBLICATION FEE $329.20
  32. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984054 RETURNED 2/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE,UNKNOWN HEIRS, BENEFICIARIES AND - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  33. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984053 RETURNED 2/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  34. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984052 RETURNED 2/27/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ZAPTOCKY/JASON/B. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  35. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52985609 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/12/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 02/21/2024.
  36. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52985614 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/09/2024 ZAPTOCKY/JASON/B. PROCESSED BY COC 02/14/2024.
  37. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52985613 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/08/2024 ZAPTOCKY/JASON/B. PROCESSED BY COC 02/14/2024.
  38. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52985612 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/09/2024 JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, PROCESSED BY COC 02/14/2024.
  39. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52985611 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/08/2024 JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, PROCESSED BY COC 02/14/2024.
  40. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  41. AFFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  42. 52985800 ON 02/06/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED ZAPTOCKY/JASON/B. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  43. 52985799 ON 02/06/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  44. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52984055 RETURNED 2/12/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  45. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  46. MAGISTRATE JIM L JACKSON ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  47. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  48. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52985610 RETURNED 2/8/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  49. SUMS COMPLAINT(52984055) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 20530
  50. SUMS COMPLAINT(52984054) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE,UNKNOWN HEIRS, BENEFICIARIES AND 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  51. SUMS COMPLAINT(52984053) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  52. SUMS COMPLAINT(52984052) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JASON B. ZAPTOCKY 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  53. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE
  54. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE
  55. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985614) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JASON B. ZAPTOCKY 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  56. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985613) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JASON B. ZAPTOCKY 18184 HOLLAND ROAD BROOKPARK, OH 44142-0000
  57. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985612) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  58. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985611) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, 18184 HOLLAND ROAD BROOKPARK, OH 44142-0000
  59. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985610) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTH 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 20530
  60. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985609) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE WASHINGTON, DC 20530-0000
  61. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985800) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JASON B. ZAPTOCKY 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  62. SUMS COMPLAINT(52985799) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JANE DOE, NAME UNKNOWN, 13491 HEATHERWOOD DRIVE BROOK PARK, OH 44142
  63. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  64. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  65. WRIT FEE
  66. WRIT FEE
  67. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  68. WRIT FEE
  69. WRIT FEE
  70. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  71. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  72. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  73. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  74. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  75. WRIT FEE
  76. WRIT FEE
  77. WRIT FEE
  78. WRIT FEE
  79. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  80. WRIT FEE
  81. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  83. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  84. WRIT FEE
  85. WRIT FEE
  86. WRIT FEE
  87. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  88. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  89. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE DANIEL GAUL
  90. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  91. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  92. LEGAL RESEARCH
  93. LEGAL NEWS
  94. LEGAL AID
  95. COMPUTER FEE
  96. CLERK'S FEE
  97. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  98. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more