Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana Unified County

Court

Indiana Unified County

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-18
Status Decided
Type Mf Mortgage Foreclosure
Docket 64 entries
Disposition Judgment entered

Parties

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, National Association As Trustee For Morgan Stanley.......
Defendant Naughton, James M. | Feeney, Thomas | United States Of America
Photo of Hon. Kantar, Kristina C

Judge

Hon. Kantar, Kristina C

Jasper County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Appearance Filed
  3. Complaint/Equivalent Pleading Filed
  4. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  5. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  6. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  7. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  8. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  9. Certificate of Issuance of Summons
  10. Service Returned Served (E-Filing)
  11. Document Filed
  12. Service Issued
  13. Service Returned Served (E-Filing)
  14. Service Returned Served (E-Filing)
  15. Subpoena/Summons Filed
  16. Appearance Filed
  17. Answer to a Complaint Filed
  18. Request for Settlement Conference Filed
  19. Order Granting Request for Settlement Conference
  20. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  21. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  22. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  23. Settlement Conference
  24. Report Filed
  25. Notice Filed
  26. Motion for Summary Judgment Filed
  27. Memorandum/Brief Filed
  28. Affidavit of Non-Military Filed
  29. Affidavit in Support of Attorney fees
  30. Affidavit Filed
  31. TR56 Evidence Designation Filed
  32. Order Issued
  33. Order Issued
  34. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  35. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  36. Invalid Email: Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  37. Motion Filed
  38. Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment
  39. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  40. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  41. Summary Judgment entered
  42. Invalid Email: Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  43. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  44. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  45. Praecipe for Order of Sale
  46. Invalid Email: Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  47. Service Issued
  48. First Class Mail Returned
  49. Service Returned Served
  50. Document Filed
  51. Administrative Event
  52. Sheriff's Return on Order of Sale
  53. Appearance Filed
  54. Petition Filed
  55. Court Scheduling Order
  56. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  57. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  58. Order Granting Motion to Release Funds
  59. First Class Mail Returned
  60. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  61. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  62. Invalid Email: Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  63. First Class Mail Returned
  64. First Class Mail Returned 11/1/23, Not delivered, ( Notice ) return to sender, attempted-not-known, unable to forward. Party: Naughton, James M.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more