Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-09-16
Status Open
Type Superior Court Refile After A Dismissal Nisi Order Mgl C 212 3 A(d) No Fee.
Docket 38 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sartini, Matthew|Sartini, Jocelyn
Defendant Pereira, Steven|Tetrault, Aaron|Tetrault Real Estate, Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Form generated: Notice of Next Event(Event Notice) CV Sent On: 11/18/2025 11:27:45
  2. Appearance filed On this date Brian R Cunha, Esq. added as Private Counsel for Plaintiff Jocelyn Sartini
  3. Complaint filed
  4. Statement of damages filed by Plaintiff alleging tort action for damages of $25000. or less (Dist./Mun.Cts.Supp.R.Civ.P. 102A).
  5. Statement of damages filed by Plaintiff alleging tort action for damages of $25000. or less (Dist./Mun.Cts.Supp.R.Civ.P. 102A).
  6. Civil action recommenced after a Superior Court dismissal nisi. Credit applied for filing fee [MGL C212 3A (b)].
  7. Return of service on complaint and summons to Aaron Tetrault: Officer service SERVED at last and usual abode (Mass.R.Civ.P. 4(f)). Received by attorney Owen McGowan on 09/27/22
  8. Appearance filed On this date Christopher C Nichols, Esq. added as Private Counsel for Defendant Aaron Tetrault
  9. Appearance filed On this date Owen P McGowan, Esq. added as Private Counsel for Defendant Aaron Tetrault
  10. Appearance filed On this date Christopher C Nichols, Esq. added as Private Counsel for Defendant Tetrault Real Estate, LLC
  11. Appearance filed On this date Owen P McGowan, Esq. added as Private Counsel for Defendant Tetrault Real Estate, LLC
  12. Return of service on complaint and summons to Tetrault Real Estate, LLC: Officer service SERVED at last and usual abode (Mass.R.Civ.P. 4(f)). Received by attorney Owen McGowan on 09/27/22
  13. Motion to obtain an unredacted copy of the relevant police report. filed by Aaron Tetrault-Defendant. Exhibits A, B, and C attached
  14. Event Scheduled Event: Motion Hearing (CV) Date: 11/03/2022 Time: 10:00 AM Result: Brought Forward
  15. Event Resulted: Motion Hearing (CV) scheduled on: 11/03/2022 10:00 AM Has been: Brought Forward For the following reason: Defendant's request without objection Hon. Kevin J. Finnerty, Presiding
  16. Return of service on complaint and summons to Steven Pereira: Officer service SERVED at last and usual abode (Mass.R.Civ.P. 4(f)). and mailed on 11/01/2022
  17. Application to clerk-magistrate to enter default against Steven Pereira filed by Matthew Sartini, Jocelyn Sartini (Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(a) & 77(b)).
  18. Default entered against Steven Pereira (Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(a)). Judge: Finnerty, Hon. Kevin J.
  19. Event Scheduled Event: Case Management Conference Date: 03/25/2025 Time: 03:25 PM Result: Event Cancelled
  20. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 03/25/2025 03:25 PM Has been: Event Cancelled For the following reason: Clerical scheduling error Hon. Kevin J. Finnerty, Presiding
  21. Event Scheduled Event: Jury Trial (CV) Date: 09/16/2025 Time: 09:00 AM Result: Reschedule of Hearing
  22. Form generated: Notice of Next Event(Event Notice) CV Sent On: 03/25/2025 15:56:25
  23. Answer filed with claim of Jury Trial.
  24. Answer filed with claim of Jury Trial.
  25. Motion to Continue Trial filed by Matthew Sartini-Plaintiff, Jocelyn Sartini-Plaintiff.
  26. Event Scheduled Event: Motion Hearing (CV) Date: 08/05/2025 Time: 10:00 AM Result: Held
  27. Event Resulted: Motion Hearing (CV) scheduled on: 08/05/2025 10:00 AM Has been: Held Hon. Heath Antonio, Presiding courtroom 3
  28. Motion to Continue Trial Date allowed . Judge: Antonio, Hon. Heath
  29. Event Scheduled Event: Jury Trial (CV) Date: 11/20/2025 Time: 09:00 AM Result: Reschedule of Hearing
  30. Form generated: Notice of Next Event(Event Notice) CV Sent On: 08/05/2025 15:42:19
  31. Motion to remove default (Mass.R.Civ.P.55[c]) filed by Steven Pereira-Defendant.
  32. Event Scheduled Event: Motion Hearing (CV) Date: 10/21/2025 Time: 10:00 AM Result: Held
  33. Motion to remove default (Mass.R.Civ.P.55[c]) allowed . Judge: Stone, Hon. Kristen A
  34. Event Resulted: Motion Hearing (CV) scheduled on: 10/21/2025 10:00 AM Has been: Held Hon. Kristen A Stone, Presiding
  35. Default removed against Steven Pereira (Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(a)). Judge: Stone, Hon. Kristen A
  36. Motion for continuance (Mass.R.Civ.P.40[b]) filed by Matthew Sartini, Jocelyn Sartini and assented to by other party(ies).
  37. Motion for continuance (Mass.R.Civ.P.40[b]) allowed . Judge: Finnerty, Hon. Kevin J.
  38. Event Scheduled Event: Jury Trial (CV) Date: 02/10/2026 Time: 09:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more