Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-28
Type Cc Breach Of Contract
Docket 33 entries
Disposition Default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Hummel, Raymond E Jr|Fleddermann, Stephen Roy
Defendant Hayes, Andrew
Photo of Hon. Pelikan Daniel G

Judge

Hon. Pelikan Daniel G

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Judgment Entered THE COURT SPECIFICALLY FINDS THAT DEFT FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED MONEY FROM PLNTFF UNDER FALSE PRETENSES AND FALSE REPRESENTATIONS. FURTHER ORDER TO AWARD COMPENSATORY DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $124,460 AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000.00. AND 10.33% ANNUM AS PER MEMO. DGP/gdb
  3. Default Judgment
  4. Hearing Held Associated Entries: 09/28/2023 - Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 09/28/2023; 11:27 AM; DANIEL G PELIKAN; St Charles Circuit Div
  5. Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 09/28/2023 - Hearing Held Scheduled For: 09/28/2023; 11:27 AM; DANIEL G PELIKAN; St Charles Circuit Div
  6. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  7. Notice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR
  8. Motion for Default Judgment Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. Notice of Service Affidavit of Return of Service of Summons - Served. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR
  11. Summons Personally Served Document ID - 23-SMOS-129; Served To - ANDREWHAYES; Served Date - 07/13/2023; Served Time - 17:03:00; Service Type - SP; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  12. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  13. Pluries Summons Issued Document ID: 23-SMOS-129, for HAYES, ANDREW. SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. HMB
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Pluries Summons Requested Request for Out of State Pluries Summons. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR
  16. Notice of Service Non-est Return of Service. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR
  17. Summons Returned Non-Est Document ID - 23-SMOS-104; Served To - ANDREWHAYES; Served Date - 07/06/2023; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - SP; Reason Description - NEST; Service Text -NO SERVICE ATTEMPT DATE PROVIDED
  18. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  19. Order - Special Process Server Associated Entries: 06/07/2023 - Request Filed +
  20. Pluries Summons Issued Document ID: 23-SMOS-104, for HAYES, ANDREW. SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. KT
  21. Summons Withdrawn Document ID - 22-SMOS-188; Served To - HAYES, ANDREW; Server - ; Served Date - 09-JUN-23; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Other; Reason Description - Recalled/Withdrawn; Service Text - SUMMONS NOT RETURNED BY ATTORNEY BUT ALIAS REQUESTED
  22. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  23. Request Filed Request for Appointment of Special Process Server. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR Associated Entries: 06/09/2023 - Order - Special Process Server
  24. Summ Req-Circ Pers Serv O/S Request for Out of State Pluries Summons. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN
  25. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  26. Alias Summons Issued Document ID: 23-SMOS-52, for HAYES, ANDREW. SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. KT
  27. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  28. Alias Summons Requested Request for Alias Summons. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR
  29. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  30. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMOS-188, for HAYES, ANDREW. SUMMONS SAVED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. MLS
  31. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  32. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN
  33. Pet Filed in Circuit Ct Petition for Breach of Contract, Fraud and Conversion; Exhibit A - Personal Loan Agreement. Filed By: STEPHEN ROY FLEDDERMANN On Behalf Of: RAYMOND E HUMMEL JR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more