Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-29
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 87 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Pineda, Daniel
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  3. Paternity
  4. Amended Summons and Complaint
  5. Comment 1st Amended
  6. Proof of Service
  7. Comment Party Served: Daniel Pineda Date Served:
  8. Request to Enter Default
  9. Judgment Regarding Parental Obligation - FL630
  10. Declaration for Default or Uncontested Judgment
  11. Proof of Service by Mail
  12. Comment Served: Daniel Pineda, Yuritzi Prado. Mailed on
  13. DCSS Supplemental Summons and Complaint FL-600
  14. Comment 1st Supplemental
  15. Proof of Service
  16. Comment Served: Daniel Pineda / Personal Service
  17. Income and Expense Declaration
  18. Comment with attachments
  19. Answer Filed Family Support
  20. Comment resp's answer to summons and complaint
  21. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  22. Comment Resp's answer
  23. Notice of Motion
  24. Comment Judg, CS, CS Mod, HC. 1st Supp - @8:00AM D302
  25. Proof of Service by Mail
  26. Comment Served: Yuritzi Prado / Mailed:
  27. Proof of Service by Mail
  28. Comment Served: Daniel Pineda / Mailed:
  29. Proof of Service by Mail
  30. Comment Party served: Daniel Pineda/ Date mailed:
  31. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  32. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  33. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  34. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  35. Result Continued Party's Motion
  36. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  37. Motion Child Support
  38. Original Type Motion Child Support
  39. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  40. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  41. Result Continued Party's Motion
  42. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  43. Motion Modify Child Support
  44. Original Type Motion Modify Child Support
  45. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  46. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  47. Result Continued Party's Motion
  48. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  49. Motion - Health Care
  50. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  51. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  52. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  53. Result Continued Party's Motion
  54. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  55. General Motion
  56. Original Type General Motion
  57. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  58. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  59. Result Continued Party's Motion
  60. Comment 1st Supplemental
  61. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  62. Appeared in Person
  63. Proof of Service by Mail
  64. Comment Served: Daniel Pineda, Yuritzi Prado. Mailed on
  65. Proof of Service by Mail
  66. Comment date mailed : - served : Daniel Pineda , Yuritzi Prado
  67. General Motion
  68. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  69. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  70. Comment 1st Supplemental
  71. Motion - Genetic Test
  72. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  73. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  74. Motion - Health Care
  75. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  76. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  77. Motion Modify Child Support
  78. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  79. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  80. Comment for Danitzi
  81. Motion Child Support
  82. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  83. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  84. Comment for Izan
  85. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  86. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  87. Hearing Time 8:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more