Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-23
Type Petition For Paternity
Docket 44 entries
Disposition DEFAULT
Photo of Hon. Worthington, Susan C.

Judge

Hon. Worthington, Susan C.

Logan County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC INITIAL FILING.
  2. PETITION FOR PATERNITY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION FOR PATERNITY
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  19. SUMMONS FEE
  20. SUMMONS ISSUED - MAILED BY ATTORNEY
  21. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - LUCAS STEPHENS FOR PLAINTIFF
  22. NOTICE OF HEARING
  23. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  24. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE VAUGHAN, DIANE TO THIS CASE.
  25. RECEIPT # 2024-712905 ON 01/23/2024. PAYOR: STEPHENS SWAFFORD LAW FOR ENRIQUEZ, CLAUDIA V TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 272.14. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-17: $193.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-17: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2024-17: $1.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-17: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-17: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-17: $7.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2024-17: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-17: $2.48 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-17: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-17: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2024-17: $10.00 ON AC88 SHERIFF’S SERVICE FEE FOR COURT HOUSE SECURITY. FD-2024-17: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  26. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT APPEAR. THE COURT NOW STRIKES THE MATTER FROM THIS DOCKET SUBJECT TO SERVICE.
  27. NOTICE OF HEARING
  28. PROOF OF SERVICE - SERVED AUSTIN PHILLIPS ON 2-7-2024 / PSS
  29. ORIGINAL SUMMONS RETURNED
  30. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT APPEAR. THE HALL IS CALLED AND THE DEFENDANT IS NOW FOUND TO BE IN DEFAULT. THE COURT SUSTAINS THE PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER.
  31. OKDHS ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND NOTICE OF NECESSARY PARTY
  32. DEFAULT TEMPORARY ORDER - JUDGE WORTHINGTON
  33. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT - PLAINTIFF
  34. NOTICE OF HEARING
  35. JUDGE VAUGHAN: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY, JOSHUA COOPER. THE COURT ORDERS THE PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION AND COMPLETE DISCOVERY AND THE CASE IS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 1, 2024 AT 9:00AM.
  36. ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION - JUDGE VAUGHAN
  37. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - JAMES MURRAY / JOSHUA COOPER FOR RESPONDENT
  38. JUDGE REASSIGNMENT SCRIPT - HD161966
  39. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, JOSHUA COOPER. THE COURT CONTINUES THE CASE TO OCTOBER 10, 2024 AT 9:00AM FOR REVIEW OF MEDIATION AND DISCOVERY.
  40. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY, JOSHUA COOPER. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE COURT CONTINUES THE CASE TO NOVEMBER 14, 2024 AT 9:00AM.
  41. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, JOSHUA COOPER FOR JAMES MURRAY. THE COURT CONTINUES THE CASE TO DECEMBER 12, 2024 AT 9:00AM, FOR PRESENTATION OF AGREEMENT.
  42. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY, JOSHUA COOPER. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE COURT CONTINUES THE CASE TO JANUARY 9, 2025 AT 9:00AM.
  43. MOTION TO ENFORCE MEDIATED AGREEMENT
  44. JUDGE WORTHINGTON: THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, LUCAS STEPHENS. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, SPENCER ALLRED FOR JOSHUA COOPER. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE MATTER CAN BE STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more