Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-26
Type Divorce With Minor Children
Docket 52 entries
Disposition Decree
Photo of Hon. Halley, David H

Judge

Hon. Halley, David H

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC INITIAL FILING.//PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION//FILED
  2. DIVORCE WITH MINOR CHILDREN
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  19. SUMMONS FEE
  20. SUMMONS ISSUED
  21. SIGNATURE PAGE FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PARENTING CLASSESS//FILED
  22. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER//FILED
  23. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE HALLEY, DAVID H TO THIS CASE.
  24. RECEIPT # 2024-784679 ON 08/14/2024. PAYOR: JOHN B MONNET TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 309.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2024-439: $193.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2024-439: $50.00 ON AC08 SHERIFF FEES. FD-2024-439: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2024-439: $0.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-439: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2024-439: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-439: $7.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2024-439: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2024-439: $0.98 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-439: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2024-439: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2024-439: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  25. ORIGINAL SUMMONS//FILED
  26. CRT MIN. COURT IS PRESENTED WITH A DECREE OF DIVORCE EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER AND PETITIONER'S ATTY JOHN MONETT AS WELL AS THE RESPONDENT PRO SE. THE COURT REVIEWS THE DECREE, FINDS THAT THERE ARE PROVISIONS FOR JOINT CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT, DIVISION OF ASSETS AND DEBTS. THE COURT ALSO FINDS THAT JURISDICTION IS PROPER. THE COURT GRANTS THE DIVORCE THIS DATE ON THE GROUNDS OF INCOMPATIBILITY AND EXECUTES THE DECREE WITH THE PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH EARLIER. THE COURT ALSO EXECUTES THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES FINDING THAT THE GUIDELINES WERE FOLLOWED,THE JOINT CHILD CUSTODY PLAN AND THE PARENTING SCHEDULE. THE COURT ALSO EXECUTES A QDRO RELATED TO THIS CASE. ALL AS PER ORDER. JUDGE HALLEY
  27. CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT//FILED
  28. CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT//FILED
  29. APPLICATION TO WAIVE THE 90 DAYS WAITING PERIOD//FILED
  30. DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  31. QUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDER//FILED
  32. CRT MIN. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED ORDER EXECUTED BY PETITIONER, PETITIONERS ATTY JOHN MONETT, AND THE RESPONDENT. THE COURT EXECUTES THE ORDER AS WELL AS THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES THIS DATE. JUDGE DAVID HALLEY.
  33. ORDERS//FILED
  34. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  35. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  36. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  37. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  38. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  39. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  40. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  41. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  42. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  43. MOTION TO ENTER
  44. NOTICE OF HEARING
  45. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON THIS DAY FOR PETITIONER’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SALE OF MARITAL RESIDENCE. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT ARE PETITIONER WITH ATTORNEY BRITTNEY FLESCH, RESPONDENT PRO SE, GAL ANGELA SMITH. RICK AND MARCIE BURNHAM SIT IN THE AUDIENCE. THE PARTIES HAVE NOT AGREED ON A REALTOR. THE COURT SELECTS MARCIE BURNHAM AFTER HEARING HER CREDENTIALS AND EXPERIENCE WITH DIVORCING COUPLES. RESPONDENT DOES NOT WANT THE HOUSE SOLD. SHE PREFERS TO REFINANCE IT IN HER NAME. SHE BELIEVES SHE CANNOT PROPERLY APPLY FOR FINANCING WITHOUT KNOWING HER PORTION OF THE SALE PROCEEDS – AN AMOUNT YET TO BE DETERMINED. THE COURT DIRECTS THE PARTIES TO MEDIATION EVEN IF IT SOLELY FOCUSES ON PROPERTY RATHER THAN ALSO INCLUDING CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATION/SUPPORT. THE PARTIES AGREE IN PRINCIPLE TO FOLLOWING BURNHAM’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PREPARING AND LISTING THE HOUSE FOR SALE. THE PARTIES DO NOT YET AGREE WHO WILL PAY ANY REPAIR COSTS WHILE READYING THE HOUSE FOR SALE. THE COURT SETS A REVIEW DATE TO ENSURE THE PARTIES HAVE DISCUSSED WITH BURNHAM HER RECOMMENDATIONS AND SET A REASONABLE TIMELINE/DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE. RESPONDENT OBJECTS TO THE ENTRY OF A JOURNAL ENTRY FORMALIZING PROCEEDINGS HAD FEBRUARY 3, 2025. THE COURT ENTERS THE ORDER OVER RESPONDENT’S OBJECTION TO THE HOUSE SALE PROCEEDS BEING PLACED IN TRUST UNTIL FURTHER COURT ORDER RATHER THAN IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION AT CLOSING. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  46. JOURNAL ENTRY-REVIEW HEARING//FILED
  47. HANDWRITTEN ORDER//FILED
  48. NOTICE
  49. CRT MIN. COURT THIS DAY EXECUTES AN AGREED ORDER REGARDING THE MARITAL RESIDENCE. IT IS SIGNED BY PETITIONER, PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY BRITTNEY FLESCH, AND DEFENDANT PRO SE. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.
  50. AGREED ORDER//FILED
  51. MOTION TO ENFORCE ORDER OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO REQUIRE IMMEDIATE SALE OF THE MARITAL RESIDENCE
  52. CRT MIN. COURT THIS DAY RECEIVED A CALL FROM PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY BRITTNEY FLESCH REPORTING HER INABILITY TO EFFECTIVELY COMMUNICATE WITH RESPONDENT AND CONCERNS FOR PROPERTY DISREPAIR AND A FAILING MORTGAGE REASSUMPTION PROCESS. RESPONDENT IMMEDIATELY ANSWERED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM THE COURT’S BAILIFF. THE COURT PARTICIPATED IN A CONFERENCE CALL WITH PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY AND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT ASSURED THE COURT THAT SHE WILL MAKE THE NEEDED MORTGAGE PAYMENT TOMORROW, THE REAL ESTATE AGENT SAW THE HOME LAST NIGHT AND HAD NO COMPLAINTS OF THE HOME’S STATE OF REPAIR, AND THE INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE ENTERED THE BACKYARD TODAY AND TOOK THE NECESSARY PHOTOS. THIS CONVERSATION SEEMED TO ALLEVIATE PETITIONER’S CONCERNS. JUDGE LORY DEWEY.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more