Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Portage Co

Court

Portage Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-11
Status CLOSED
Type Dr Never Married
Docket 30 entries
Disposition other terminations

Parties

Plaintiff Ridenour, Kenneth J
Defendant Verity, Autumn M
Photo of Hon. Carnes Thomas J Probate

Judge

Hon. Carnes Thomas J Probate

Portage County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. DEPOSIT RCVD FROM KENNETH RIDENOUR Receipt: 74065 Date: 03/02/2012
  2. COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY -FILED BY KENNETH RIDENOUR Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  3. MOTION (LETTER) TO TERMINATE CHILD SUPPT - FILED BY KENNETH RIDENOUR
  4. CUSTODY AFFIDAVIT
  5. COMPUTERIZED RESEARCH Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  6. COMPUTERIZATION FEE Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  7. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  8. SUMMONS ISSUED FOR PRETRIAL ON APRIL 18, 2012 AT 3:00 PM Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  9. Issue Date: 03/02/2012 Service: CMPLT FOR CUSTODY & MOTION TO TERMINATE CHILD SUPPT W SUMMONS FOR 04-18-12 AT 3:00 PM-CERTIFIED (J) Method: CERTIFIED MAIL (JUV) Cost Per: $ 0.00 VERITY, AUTUMN M 3067 JUDYTH ST. SE WARREN, OH 44484 Tracking No: 7196900891110143070 Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  10. HEARING SET: Event: A CIVIL PRETRIAL - NOTICE TO: KENNETH J RIDENOUR Date: 04/18/2012 Time: 3:00 pm Judge: AYLWARD, JAMES J Location: Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  11. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : CERTIFIED MAIL (JUV) Issued : 03/02/2012 Service : SUMMONS-CERTIFIED (J) Served : 03/15/2012 Return : 03/16/2012 On : VERITY, AUTUMN M Signed By : AUTUMN VERITY Reason : (JUV) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking #: 7196900891110143070
  12. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. 04-18-12 PRETRIAL. PETITIONER KENNETH RIDENOUR APPEARED W/O COUNSEL. NO APPEARANCES WERE MADE BY OR ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT AUTUMN VERITY. THIS MATTER SHALL BE SET FOR TRIAL. COPY TO A. VERITY, K. RIDENOUR Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  13. HEARING SET: Event: A TRIAL NOTICE TO: KENNETH RIDENOUR AUTUMN VERITY Date: 06/25/2012 Time: 1:30 pm Judge: AYLWARD, JAMES J Location: Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  14. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER/ DECISION. MATTER CAME ON FOR HRG ON PETITIONER'S COMPLT FOR CUST ON JUNE 25, 2012. PETITIONER KENNETH RIDENOUR APPEARED WITHOUT COUNSEL. NO APPEARANCE WAS MADE BY OR ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT, AUTUMN VERITY. PETITIONER IS EMPLOYED AND EARNS ABOUT $18,700.00 PER YEAR AND RESPONDENT COULD APPARENTLY BE EMPLOYED AT A MINIMUM WAGE JOB SO FOR THE CHILD SUPPORT COMPUTATION SHE WILL BE IMPUTED INCOME OF $16,016.00 PER YEAR. PURSUANT TO THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES WORKSHEET ATTACHED HERETO RESPONDENT'S CHILD SUPPORT IS $227.18 PER MONTH PLUS PROCESS FEE. IT IS THE DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE THAT IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD THAT KENNETH RIDENOUR BE DESIGNATED THE CHILD'S RESIDENTIAL PARENT AND LEGAL CUST. RESPONDENT SHALL HAVE VISITS SUPERVISED AT HER FATHER'S HOME AT SUCH TIMES AS THE PARTIES MAY AGREE. PETITIONERS CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION TO RESPONDENT IS SUSPENDED AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2011 AND RESPONDENTS CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION SHALL COMMENCE ON MARCH 3, 2012, THE DATE THE PETITION WAS FILED. COSTS TO PETITIONER. COPIES TO KENNETH RIDENOUR, A. VERITY, AND CSEA Receipt: 74819 Date: 06/26/2012
  15. PURS. TO JRLE 01-28-94 JUV COURT DOES NOT REFUND OR BILL ACCTS BALANCING LESS/MORE THAN $5.00 MAGISTRATES ORDER OF JUNE 26, 2012 HAS BEEN ADJUSTED BY $2.85
  16. MOTION FOR ORDER TO WITHHOLD LUMP SUM PAYMENT
  17. ORDER TO WITHHOLD LUMP SUM PAYMENTS FROM AUTUMN VERITY'S INCOME SOURCE - OHIO DEPT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS IN THE AMT OF $9,618.83
  18. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  19. Issue Date: 07/05/2016 Service: MOTION & ORDER TO WITHHOLD (J) Method: REGULAR MAIL (JUV) Cost Per: $0.47 RIDENOUR, KENNETH J 1915 ST RT 59; APT 54 KENT, OH 44240 Tracking No: R000031740 VERITY, AUTUMN M 6160 SYCAMORE HILL DR; APT 22 FLORENCE, KY 41042 Tracking No: R000031741
  20. Issue Date: 07/05/2016 Service: CERTIFIED ORDER TO WITHHOLD (J) Method: INNER OFFICE (JUV) Cost Per: $ MORRISON, NANCY 209 S CHESTNUT ST P.O. BOX 1208 CSEA RAVENNA, OH 44266 Tracking No: I000001604
  21. BATCH SCAN: COMPLETE FILE
  22. JOURNAL ENTRY: AN ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO R.C. 2301.03(P)
  23. JUDGMENT ENTRY - ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER FILED.
  24. JUDGMENT ENTRY FILED.
  25. CSEA DISPOSITION.
  26. COPY ISSUED TO DOMESTIC COURT.
  27. COPY ISSUED TO DOMESTIC COURT.
  28. TERMINATION OF SUPPORT PAYMENTS TO PO CTY WELFARE DEPT FILED (R58).
  29. CSEA NOTICE OF RULE 58 ISSUED TO ATTYS/PARTIES BY REGULAR MAIL OR FACSIMILE KENNETH J RIDENOUR (PLAINTIFF); CSEA RULE 58 (NOTICE) Sent on: 10/24/2023 08:41:34.91 KENNETH J RIDENOUR (PLAINTIFF); KENNETH J RIDENOUR (PLAINTIFF);
  30. CSEA NOTICE OF RULE 58 ISSUED TO ATTYS/PARTIES BY REGULAR MAIL OR FACSIMILE AUTUMN M VERITY (DEFENDANT);

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more