Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Sussex County

Court

Sussex County

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-10
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type Ll Mechanics Lien
Docket 65 entries
Disposition remov

Parties

Plaintiff Cale Johnson Construction, Inc.
Defendant Bucher, Mark
Photo of Hon. Conner Mark H

Judge

Hon. Conner Mark H

Sussex County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING MECHANIC LIEN
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. PRAECIPE FILED
  4. SUMMONS
  5. SUMMONS
  6. WRIT ISSUED
  7. WRIT ISSUED
  8. NOTICE
  9. WRIT ISSUED
  10. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  11. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  12. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  13. ANSWER & 3rd PARTY COMPLAINT
  14. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  15. WRIT ISSUED
  16. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  17. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  18. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  19. MOTION TO DISMISS
  20. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
  21. RSP MOTION TO DISMISS
  22. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  23. MOTION REMOVED FROM CALENDAR
  24. NOTICE
  25. ANSWER & 3rd PARTY COMPLAINT
  26. ANSWER AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: MAY 29, 2024 MARK AND AMY BUCHER'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH SEPARATE DEFENSES, COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (DANIEL A. GRIFFITH) PRAECIPE TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT SUMMONS TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 73234434
  27. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING
  28. LAST RESPONSIVE PLEADING (CASE NOT READY, 3RD PARTY COMPLAINT FILED) DATE DOCKETED: MAY 29, 2024
  29. WRIT ISSUED
  30. WRIT(S) ISSUED DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 6, 2024 SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF SUSSEX COUNTY FOR SERVICE ON CALE JOHNSON & JORDAN WILLIAMS ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 73316205
  31. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  32. WRIT RETURNED: DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 14, 2024 WRIT RETURNED 06-11-2024 RE: JORDAN WILLIAMS, DEPUTY SERVED CALE JOHNSON ON 06-07-2024, AT ABOVE ADDRESS WHERE HE EMPLOYED AND PERSON IS OF LEGAL AGE. WRIT RETURNED 06-11-2024, DEPUTY MADE PERSONAL SERVICE TO CALE JOHNSON ON 06-07-2024. ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 73388442
  33. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  34. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2024 ARMAND J. DELLA PORTA, JR., ESQUIRE ENTERS HIS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT CALE JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT CALE JOHNSON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74314644
  35. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  36. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 ARMAND J. DELLA PORTA, JR., ESQUIRE ENTERS HIS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT JORDAN WILLIAMS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74360384
  37. MOTION TO DISMISS
  38. MOTION TO DISMISS DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS CALE JOHNSON AND JORDAN WILLIAMS' MOTION TO DISMISS (VICTORIA K. PETRONE / ARMAND J. DELLA PORTA, JR.) NOTICE OF MOTION TO BE HEARD ON 11-1-24 AT 12:00 P.M. PROPOSED ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: MMT TRANSACTION ID: 74368880
  39. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
  40. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2024 ANSWER OF CALE JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO COUNTERCLAIM AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (VICTORIA K. PETRONE/ARMAND J. DELLA PORTA JR) CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 74373147
  41. RSP MOTION TO DISMISS
  42. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 23, 2024 THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, MARK AND AMY BUCHER'S OPPOSITION TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (DANIEL A. GRIFFITH, ESQUIRE) (10 PAGES) PROPOSED ORDER TO THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, MARK AND AMY BUCHER'S OPPOSITION TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (DANIEL A. GRIFFITH, ESQUIRE) (2 PAGES) NOTICE OF THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, MARK AND AMY BUCHER'S OPPOSITION TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (DANIEL A. GRIFFITH, ESQUIRE) (2 PAGES) ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 74816305
  43. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  44. REPLY BRIEF FILED DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 29, 2024 REPLY BRIEF OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS CALE JOHNSON AND JORDAN WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (VICTORIA PETRONE/ARMAND J. DELLA PORTA JR.) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO REPLY BRIEF OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS CALE JOHNSON AND JORDAN WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS ACCEPTED BY: SB TRANSACTION ID: 74880573
  45. MOTION REMOVED FROM CALENDAR
  46. MOTION SCHEDULED 11-01-2024 - SB REMOVED FROM CALENDAR - JUDGE CONNER UNAVAILABLE DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 30, 2024
  47. NOTICE
  48. THE MOTION WAS RESCHEDULED FOR 12-20-24 AT 12PM PER EMAIL 11-19-2024 WITH COUNSEL - SB DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 9, 2024
  49. MOTION PASSED
  50. MOTION PASSED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 20, 2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more