Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-22
Type Ac Refus Breath 302.750/577.04
Docket 17 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Defendant Missouri Department Of Revenue
Photo of Hon. Shafer Abe Quint V

Judge

Hon. Shafer Abe Quint V

Clay County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Dismissed by Parties
  3. Motion to Dismiss DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed. (nlk) Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN On Behalf Of: CARL JOSEPH PHILLIPS
  4. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  5. Retn Serv-Reg/Cert Mail Succs Document ID - 22-SMCM-201; Served To - MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; Server - ; Served Date - 29-AUG-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Certified Mail; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - Summons personally served to MO DIR by certified mail on August 29, 2022. (nlk)
  6. Notice of Service SERVICE RETURN filed. (nlk) Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN On Behalf Of: CARL JOSEPH PHILLIPS
  7. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  8. Subpoena Prepared
  9. Subpoena Requested REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA filed. (nlk) Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN
  10. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  11. Judge/Clerk - Note Petitioner's driving record indicates prior 10 year denial. Stay Order requested is denied at this time. AQS/slc
  12. Summons Issued-Reg/Cert Mail Document ID: 22-SMCM-201, for MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. and returned to the Attorney for the Petitioner to forward by Certified Mail to the Respondent. (rlb)
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN
  15. Proposed Order Filed PROPOSED ORDER STAYING REVOCATION OF DRIVER LICENSE filed and forwarded to the Judge for review. (rlb) Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN On Behalf Of: CARL JOSEPH PHILLIPS
  16. Application Filed APPLICATION FOR STAY filed. (rlb) Driving record. Proof of insurance. Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN
  17. Pet Filed in Associate Ct PETITION FOR REVIEW TO CONTEST LICENSE REVOCATION PURSUANT TO MO. REV. STAT. 302.574 (2019) filed. (rlb) Filed By: JEFFREY SCOTT EASTMAN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more