Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-29
Type Divorce With Minor Children
Docket 38 entries
Disposition Decree
Photo of Hon. Halley, David H

Judge

Hon. Halley, David H

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC INITIAL FILING.//PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND DECREE OF DIVORCE//FILED
  2. DIVORCE WITH MINOR CHILDREN
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  19. SUMMONS ISSUED
  20. SUMMONS ISSUED - SHERIFF
  21. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER//FILED
  22. SIGNATURE PAGE FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PARENTING CLASSES//FILED
  23. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE STRUBHAR, KHRISTAN K. TO THIS CASE.
  24. RECEIPT # 2022-721057 ON 11/29/2022. PAYOR: MATTHEW AARON SAUNDERS TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 309.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2022-637: $193.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2022-637: $50.00 ON AC08 SHERIFF FEES. FD-2022-637: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2022-637: $0.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-637: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2022-637: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-637: $7.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2022-637: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2022-637: $0.98 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-637: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-637: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2022-637: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  25. ORIGINAL SUMMONS/FILED
  26. LETTER//FILED
  27. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE//FILED
  28. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM//FILED
  29. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS//FILED
  30. CSS'S ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND NOTICE OF NECESSARY PARTY//FILED
  31. AGREED TEMPORARY ORDER//FILED
  32. CRT MIN. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED TEMPORARY ORDER. REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER IS TODD WADDELL REPRESENTING THE RESPONDENT IS SUZANNE GRIMES. THE COURT REVIEWS THE AGREED TEMPORARY ORDER, JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY TO BOTH PARTIES, VISITATION WITH THE PETITIONER WILL BE FROM 2:30PM ON FRIDAY UNTIL 6:00PM ON SUNDAY. THE COURT EXECUTES THE AGREED T.O. WITH THE SIGNATURES OF BOTH ATTY'S AND BOTH PARTIES. THE COURT ALSO EXECUTES THE JUDICIAL ORDER OF PROPER CONDUCT. THE COURT ALSO EXECUTES AN AGREED ORDER DISMISSING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND THIS IS PO-2022-418 SAUNDERS V SAUNDERS. THE COURT EXECUTES THE ORDER DISMISSING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER ON THIS DATE AT THE BEHEST OF BOTH PARTIES. JUDGE HALLEY
  33. NOTICE OF COMPLETION/FILED
  34. MOTION TO ENTER//FILED
  35. CRT MIN. COMES ON FOR A MOTION TO ENTER. THE COURT INSTRUCTS THE PARTIES TO GET A MEDIATION DATE PRIOR TO THE PRETRIAL WHICH IS SET FOR 11/9/2023 AT 1:30PM. JUDGE HALLEY
  36. HANDWRITTEN ORDER//FILED
  37. DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  38. CRT MIN. COMES ON FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. THE RESPONDENT APPEARS IN PERSON ALONG WITH HER ATTY SUZANNE GRIMES. THE PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE. THE COURT CONTACTS THE STILL RECOGNIZED ATTY FOR THE PETITIONER TODD WADDELL. MR. WADDELL IN A PHONE CONFERENCE WITH THIS COURT INDICATED THAT HE THOUGHT HE HAD BEEN FIRED IN AUGUST AND HAD NO OBJECTION TO THE PETITIONER PROCEEDING WITHOUT HIS PRESENCE OR COUNSEL. THE COURT HAS A CONFERENCE WITH THE PARTIES. THE PETITIONER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT MR. WADDELL IS NOT HIS ATTY AND HAS NOT BEEN HIS ATTY SINCE AUGUST AND WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED WITHOUT HIM AND THE COURT CONSENTS TO THAT. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. THE COURT GOES OVER EACH OF THE SPECIFIC ITEMS WITH THE PETITIONER AND MR. SAUNDERS IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE PROVISIONS IN THE DECREE AS PROPOSED. THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT BOTH EXECUTED THE DIVORCE DECREE AS WELL AS THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES ALONG WITH RESPONDENTS ATTY SUZANNE GRIMES. THE COURT AFTER REVIEW FINDS THAT THERE ARE PROVISIONS FOR THE CUSTODY, VISITATION, CHILD SUPPORT AND DIVISION OF ASSETS AND DEBTS. FINDS THOSE TO BE JUST AND EQUITABLE AS EVIDENCED BY THE PARTIES SIGNATURES. THE RESPONDENT WISHED TO BE RESTORED TO THE LAST NAME OF LEDESMA. THE COURT EXECUTES THE DIVORCE DECREE, THE JOINT CHILD CUSTODY PLAN AND CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES AND GRANTS THE PARTIES A DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF INCOMPATIBILITY THIS DATE. JUDGE HALLEY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more