Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ AB-30 days to 12/19/2022
- West Publishing
- Affirmed - Citation
- Attorneys fees denied (OD47) ~ Upon consideration of Appellee's Motion for Attorney's Fees, it is ordered that said Motion is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellee filing the Motion before the probate court. See Townsend v. Mansfield, 46 Fla. L. Weekly D2205 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 6, 2021), reh'g denied (Nov. 4, 2021). Pro se Appellant's Motion for Appellate Attorneys' Fees is hereby denied.
- Rehearing denied (OD57) ~ Upon consideration, pro se Appellant's Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Sanctions is hereby denied. FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ., concur.
- RESPONSE ~ Response to Motion for Rehearing
- Motion For Rehearing ~ Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Sanctions and Reversal of Two Trial Orders Due to Appellee's and Her Counsel's Fraud Upon the Court
- Miscellaneous Motion Denied (OD999) ~ Upon consideration, Appellee's Motion for Order Authorizing the Filing of a Limited Response to the Reply Brief is hereby denied. The Motion is treated as a motion to strike the argument and issues first raised in the reply brief, and to that extent, the motion to strike is granted. To the extent that the reply brief raises new issues not previously raised in the reply brief, and not responsive to the answer brief, those portions of the reply brief are hereby stricken, and will not be considered by the Court. Facts alleged in the reply brief that are not supported by the record are similarly stricken and will not be considered by the Court. The briefing period is now closed and this appeal is deemed perfected. FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ., concur.
- Miscellaneous Motion ~ Appellee's Motion for Order Authorizing the Filing a Limited Response to the Reply Brief
- Appellant's Reply Brief
- Extension granted to file reply brief NFE (OG05A) ~ Pro se Appellant's Verified Motion for Extension of Time to File the Reply Brief is granted to and including March 24, 2023, with no further extensions allowed.
- Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
- Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ RB-14 days to 2/22/23
- Notice of Agreed Extension of Time
- Motion For Attorney's Fees
- Appellee's Answer Brief
- Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
- Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ AB-30 days to 01/18/2023
- Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
