Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-23
Type Ac Suit On Account
Docket 42 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Wakefield And Associates Inc|Schierding, Brian Gerald
Defendant Nieblas, Francine J
Photo of Hon. Long Colin P

Judge

Hon. Long Colin P

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Summons Returned Non-Est Document ID - 23-AASM-288; Served To - NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J; Server - SO PULASKI COUNTY-WAYNESVILLE; Served Date - 16-AUG-23; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Non-est
  3. Note to Clerk eFiling
  4. Notice of Service
  5. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  6. Dismiss by Ct w/o Prejudice CAUSE CALLED. PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY. DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF FAILS TO OBTAIN SERVICE. COURT ENTERS ORDER AS FOLLOWS. THE CLAIM FILED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ORDERED DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COST ASSESSED AGAINST PLAINTIFF. SO ORDERED CPL Associated Entries: 05/17/2023 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 05/19/2023 - Court Trial Scheduled Scheduled For: 07/19/2023; 9:00 AM; COLIN P LONG; Pulaski
  7. Order of Dismissal Filed By: COLIN P LONG
  8. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  9. Alias Summons Issued Document ID: 23-AASM-288, for NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J.
  10. Alias Summons Requested Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING On Behalf Of: WAKEFIELD AND ASSOCIATES INC
  11. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  12. Summons Returned Non-Est Document ID - 23-ADSM-988; Served To - NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J; Server - SCHIERDING, BRIAN GERALD; Served Date - 02-JUN-23; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Other; Reason Description - Non-est
  13. Notice of Service Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING On Behalf Of: WAKEFIELD AND ASSOCIATES INC
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Summons Issued-Associate Document ID: 23-ADSM-988, for NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J.
  16. Notice of Court Hearing Sent
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/19/2023 - Dismiss by Ct w/o Prejudice + Scheduled For: 07/19/2023; 9:00 AM; COLIN P LONG; Pulaski
  19. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  20. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled CAUSE CALLED. PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT THE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS SUSTAINED. CASE CONTINUED TO 7-19-2023 AT 9:00 A.M. SO ORDERED CPL Associated Entries: 04/12/2023 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 04/14/2023 - Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/19/2023 - Dismiss by Ct w/o Prejudice + Hearing Continued From: 05/17/2023; 9:00 AM Court Trial
  21. Order for Continuance Filed By: COLIN P LONG
  22. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  23. Summons Issued-Associate Document ID: 23-ADSM-693, for NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J.
  24. Notice of Court Hearing Sent
  25. Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 05/17/2023 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 05/17/2023; 9:00 AM; COLIN P LONG; Pulaski
  26. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  27. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled CAUSE CALLED. PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY ATTORNEY. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT THE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS SUSTAINED. CASE CONTINUED TO 5-17-2023 AT 9:00 A.M. CASE CONTINUED TO OBTAIN SERVICE FOR DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED CPL Associated Entries: 02/24/2023 - Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 05/17/2023 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Hearing Continued From: 04/12/2023; 10:00 AM Court Trial
  28. Order for Continuance Filed By: COLIN P LONG
  29. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  30. Summons Returned Non-Est Document ID - 23-ADSM-375; Served To - NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J; Server - SO PULASKI COUNTY-WAYNESVILLE; Served Date - 07-APR-23; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Non-est
  31. Note to Clerk eFiling
  32. Notice of Service
  33. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  34. Summons Issued-Associate Document ID: 23-ADSM-375, for NIEBLAS, FRANCINE J.
  35. Notice of Court Hearing Sent
  36. Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 04/12/2023 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 04/12/2023; 10:00 AM; COLIN P LONG; Pulaski
  37. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  38. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING
  39. Affidavit Filed AFFIDAVIT OF RESTRUCTURE. Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING On Behalf Of: WAKEFIELD AND ASSOCIATES INC
  40. Affidavit Filed AFFIDAVIT OF DEBT. Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING
  41. Affidavit in Support of Pet AFFIDAVIT. Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING
  42. Pet Filed in Associate Ct PETITION. Filed By: BRIAN GERALD SCHIERDING

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more