Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Judge/Clerk - Note Certified copies of the Judgment of Dissolution and Final Parenting Plan were sent to the Petitioner and Respondent by ordinary mail. rm
- Cert of Dissolution Mailed CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION; sent to the Bureau of Vital Records by ordinary mail. rm
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Final Parenting Plan Filed
- Judgment on Dissolution
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Order Petitioner appears in person; respondent appears in person; both parties are pro se; case comes on for hearing; court finds that it has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this litigation; parties? marriage is irretrievably broken and cannot be preserved and, therefore, marriage is dissolved; each party shall retain the property in their current possession without further division; court awards the parties' real property located at 108 Jefferson Street in Greencastle, Missouri to respondent free and clear of all claim of petitioner; legal and physical custody of the children is awarded jointly to the parties as set forth in the proposed parenting plan which the court finds to be in the best interests of the children; court finds that the application of the Missouri Supreme Court Guidelines to the facts of this case would be unjust and inappropriate; to the contrary, based upon all relevant factors, neither party shall pay child support to the other; neither party shall pay maintenance to the other and this conclusion is not modifiable; each party shall satisfy their own attorney fees; costs are assessed against petitioner. TAT Filed By: TERRY ALAN TSCHANNEN
- Uncontested Associated Entries: 09/08/2023 - Uncont Dissolution Hrng Sched Scheduled For: 10/04/2023; 11:00 AM; TERRY ALAN TSCHANNEN; Sullivan
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Notice NOTICE OF ENTRY was sent to the Petitioner and Respondent by ordinary mail. rm
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Uncont Dissolution Hrng Sched Associated Entries: 10/04/2023 - Uncontested Scheduled For: 10/04/2023; 11:00 AM; TERRY ALAN TSCHANNEN; Sullivan
- Proposed Judmt/Dec Dis Filed Filed By: LARINDA THOMPSON
- Separation Agreement Filed Filed By: LARINDA THOMPSON
- Proposed Parenting Plan Filed Filed By: LARINDA THOMPSON
- Parent Education Complete Filed By: LARINDA THOMPSON
- Parent Education Complete Filed By: MATTHEW GERALD THOMPSON
- Income & Expense Stmnt Filed Filed By: LARINDA THOMPSON
- Answer Filed Filed By: MATTHEW GERALD THOMPSON
- Confid Dom Rel Info File Sheet Filed By: LARINDA THOMPSON
- Certificate of Dissolution
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In