Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Wyoming Supreme Court

Court

Wyoming Supreme Court

Wyoming

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-16
Status Closed
Type Direct Appeal Civil Common Law Property
Docket 44 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Event - Docketed and indexed
  2. Notice-Incoming - Record completion notice from district court
  3. Fees - Docket fee received (Receipt e-served via CTEF)
  4. Notice-Outgoing - Docketing letter (E-served via CTEF)
  5. Notice-Outgoing - E-filing requirement A. Obrecht at email address on file with Bar
  6. Event - Phone Call from appellant's counsel - All claims and counterclaims involving North Silo were resolved by DC order and they should not be listed as an appellee.
  7. Case Memorandum and Amended Case Caption (North Silo has been removed as party)
  8. Motion - Extension of time - brief
  9. Event - Hardcopy received - Appellant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief
  10. rder - Grant - extension of time
  11. rief - Appellant
  12. vent - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellant Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC
  13. otice-Incoming - Designation of record (Appellant)
  14. otion - Extension of time - file response/objection
  15. rder Granting Appellee's Request for Extension to File Brief
  16. rief - Appellee (Woods)
  17. vent - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellees Paul and Cheryl Woods
  18. rief - Appellee (Deselms)
  19. otice-Outgoing - Notice of case maturity
  20. otice-Outgoing - Request for transmitted record on appeal
  21. rief - Appellant reply
  22. vent - Hardcopy received - Reply Brief of Appellant Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC
  23. otice-Incoming - Supplemental Designation of record (Deselms)
  24. vent - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellee Deselms
  25. ecord - Transmitted record on appeal, four volumes. Volumes 1-3, Original Papers; Volume 4, Transcript.
  26. otice-Outgoing - Transmitted record on appeal filed
  27. rder - Oral argument scheduled
  28. otice-Outgoing - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting (complete and return by email to Clerk's Office)
  29. otice-Incoming - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting received from J. Daraie obo Appellee (Deselms)
  30. otice-Incoming - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting received from M. Roley obo appellee (Woods)
  31. otice-Incoming - Additional authority
  32. vent - Hardcopy received - Notice of Additional Authority
  33. otice-Internal - Oral argument notice argued before Chief Justice Fox; Justices Boomgaarden; Gray; Fenn and Jarosh (Lucas Buckley, Kari Hartman and Aaron Bieber, appearing obo the appellant with argument presented by Mr. Buckley and Justin Daraie arguing obo appellee Deselms; and Michael Roley and Alexander Davidson appearing obo appellee Woods, with argument presented by Mr. Roley) and taken under advisement
  34. pinion - Opinion and journal order affirming, with Justice Boomgaarden writing for the Court.
  35. otion - Fees and costs (Paul and Cheryl Woods)
  36. vent - Hardcopy received - Motion for Costs
  37. otion - Fees and costs (Hugh Deselms)
  38. vent - Hardcopy received - Motion for Costs
  39. rder Awarding Costs (Appellees Paul and Cheryl Woods)
  40. rder Awarding Costs (Appellee Deselms)
  41. otice-Outgoing - Mandate
  42. ecord - Record returned to district court
  43. otice-Outgoing - Record return letter
  44. vent - Case closed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more