Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-13
Status JUDGMENT - JUDGMENT
Type Cl Fraud Enforcement
Docket 97 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Lindsey, Robert|Lindsey, Stacy|Lindsey, Davis|Stacy Curran Lindsay Trust
Defendant Dalpour, Idin|Maxben Holdings,|Maxben Ventures,
Photo of Hon. Brennan Danielle J

Judge

Hon. Brennan Danielle J

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOTICE
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. SUMMONS
  5. MOTION SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  6. ORDER
  7. WRIT ISSUED
  8. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  9. WRIT ISSUED
  10. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL (SIGN)
  11. ORDER
  12. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  13. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  14. E-MAIL FILED
  15. NOTICE
  16. ORDER
  17. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  18. MOTION GRANTED
  19. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  20. LETTER
  21. LETTER
  22. LETTER
  23. LETTER
  24. LETTER
  25. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  26. ORDER
  27. LETTER
  28. LETTER
  29. ORDER
  30. ORDER
  31. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  32. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  33. CERTIFIED COPY REQUEST
  34. CERTIFIED COPY REQUEST
  35. MISC-EXEMPLIFIED JUDGMENT
  36. MISC-EXEMPLIFIED JUDGMENT
  37. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  38. JUDGMENT BY ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 5, 2024 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST: DEFENDANT JUDGMENT AMOUNTS TO BE DETERMINED AT THE INQUISTIION HEARING.
  39. LETTER
  40. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 8, 2024 LETTER TO THE PARTIES PROVIDING NOTICE OF A SCHEDULED INQUISITION HEARING FOR TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2024 AT 2:00 WITH COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR VIA ZOOM. ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 73338042
  41. LETTER
  42. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 20, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR PROVIDING EXHIBITS FOR THE INQUISITION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2024 ACCEPTED BY: ST TRANSACTION ID: 73729217
  43. LETTER
  44. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 24, 2024 LETTER TO PARTIES PROVIDING NOTICE, THE INQUISITION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 23, 2024, AT 2:00 BEFORE COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR WILL BE RESCHEDULED AT A TIME CONVENIENT TO THE COURT. ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 73766690
  45. LETTER
  46. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 25, 2024 LETTER TO PARTIES REGARDING A SCHEDULED INQUISITION HEARING, SEPTEMBER 3, 2024 AT 2:00 P.M. WITH COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR VIA ZOOM ACCEPTED BY: KC TRANSACTION ID: 73772380
  47. LETTER
  48. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 4, 2024 LETTER TO PARTIES REGARDING A RESCHEDULED INQUISITION HEARING, SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 AT 9:30 A.M. WITH COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR VIA ZOOM ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 74210779
  49. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  50. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2024 DEFENDANTS DID NOT APPEAR FOR THE HEARING. ROBERT LINDSEY APPEARED TO TESTIFY. DAVIS LINDSEY APPEARED TO TESTIFY. STACY LINDSEY APPEARED TO TESTIFY. IF PLAINTIFF DESIRES TO SEEK PUNITIVE DAMAGES, PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL SUBMIT TO THE COURT WRITTEN DOCUMENT REGARDING PUNITIVE DAMAGES WITHIN 2 WEEKS. PLAINTIFF COUNSEL SHALL SUBMIT SEPARATE PROPOSED ORDERS FOR DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY FEES, WITHIN 30 DAYS. ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 74317792
  51. ORDER
  52. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 ORDER. THE REQUEST FOR A TWO-WEEK CONTINUANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED. ALL DEADLINES HAVE BEEN EXTENDED TWO WEEKS. SIGNED SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 BY COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR ACCEPTED BY: MLM TRANSACTION ID: 74594350
  53. LETTER
  54. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 5, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR PROVIDING DOCUMENTATION REGARDING DAMAGES EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C ACCEPTED BY: KC TRANSACTION ID: 74677012
  55. LETTER
  56. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 12, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR PROVIDING PROPOSED ORDER FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES PROPOSED ORDER- ATTORNEYS' FEES ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 74741405
  57. ORDER
  58. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 1, 2024 ORDER AWARDING DAMAGES IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS, SIGNED OCTOBER 30, 2024 BY COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 74912158
  59. ORDER
  60. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 1, 2024 ORDER AWARDING LEGAL FEES, SIGNED OCTOBER 30, 2024 BY COMMISSIONER O'CONNOR ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 74912158
  61. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  62. JUDGMENT BY ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 1, 2024 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST: IDIN DALPOUR MAXBEN HOLDINGS, MAXBEN VENTURES, JUDGMENT AMOUNTS TO BE PAID AS FOLLOWS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Affidavit submitted by attorney Mark Denney Jr., Esq. on October 11, 2024, that legal fees and associated costs are awarded in the amount of $14,156.02
  63. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  64. JUDGMENT BY ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 1, 2024 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST: IDIN DALPOUR MAXBEN HOLDINGS, MAXBEN VENTURES, JUDGMENT AMOUNTS TO BE PAID AS FOLLOWS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Robert Lindsey, individually and in his capacity as co-trustee of the Stacy Curran Lindsay Trust dated January 16, 1986 ( the trust), Stacey C. Lindsey, individually and as beneficiary of the Trust Davis Lindsey individually and as a co-trustee of the Trust and the Trust ( collectively Plaintiffs) are awarded damages in the total amount of $3,477,066.00 plus attorney fees, court costs, and post judgment interest. These damages are awarded in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the damages are apportioned as follows: Robert Lindsey, in his individual capacity is awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $779,400.00 resuliting from the fraud, breach of contract, and Delaware Securities Act judgment, and punitive damages in the amount of $250,000.00 resulting from the fraud judgment. Stacy Curran Lindsay Trust is awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $1,016,450.00 resulting from the fraud, breach of contract, and Delaware Securities Act Judgments, and punitive damages in the amount of $250,000.00 resulting from the fraud judgment. Stacy Lindsey in her individual capacity, is awarded compenstory damages in the amount of $374,400.00 resulting from the fraud, breach of contract, and Delaware Securities Act judgments, and punitive damages in the amount of $100,000.00 resulting from the fraud judgment Davis Lindsey in his individual capacity is awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $556,816.00 resulting from the fraud, breach of contract, and Delaware Securities Act Judgments, and punitive damages in the amount of $150,000.00 resulting from the fraud judgment.
  65. CERTIFIED COPY REQUEST
  66. CERTIFIED COPY REQUEST DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 14, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO THE PROTHONOTARY, REQUESTING CERTIFIED COPIES OF ORDER [DI 26]. ACCEPTED BY: MBM TRANSACTION ID: 75217226
  67. CERTIFIED COPY REQUEST
  68. CERTIFIED COPY REQUEST DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 14, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO THE PROTHONOTARY, REQUESTING CERTIFIED COPIES OF ORDER [DI 27]. ACCEPTED BY: MBM TRANSACTION ID: 75217226
  69. MISC-EXEMPLIFIED JUDGMENT
  70. LETTER FOR COPY OF EXEMPLIFIED JUDGMENT DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 21, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO THE PROTHONOTARY, REQUESTING EXEMPLIFIED COPIES OF ORDER [DI 26]. ACCEPTED BY: MLM TRANSACTION ID: 75278333
  71. MISC-EXEMPLIFIED JUDGMENT
  72. LETTER FOR COPY OF EXEMPLIFIED JUDGMENT DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 21, 2024 LETTER FROM MARK A. DENNEY, JR., ESQ. TO THE PROTHONOTARY, REQUESTING EXEMPLIFIED COPIES OF ORDER [DI 27]. ACCEPTED BY: MLM TRANSACTION ID: 75278333
  73. NOTICE
  74. NOTICE: SENT AN EMAIL TO ATTORNEY DENNEY TO LET HIM KNOW THAT THE TWO REQUESTS FOR EXEMPLIFIED COPIES ARE READY FOR PICK UP. DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 20, 2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more