Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-12
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (3 An)|Other Superior Court Complaint
Docket 39 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Strickland, Clayton Elgin
Defendant Simkiss, Ronald|The State Of Alaska Department Of Natural Resource
Photo of Hon. Guidi, Andrew

Judge

Hon. Guidi, Andrew

Anchorage Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Dismissed by Stipulation or Unopposed Motion
  2. Complaint for Quiet Title Receipt: 1966618 Date: 05/16/2022
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Attorney Information Attorney Cromer, Christopher M representing Plaintiff(s) Strickland, Clayton Elgin as of 05/12/2022
  5. Notice of Filing Unsigned Affidavit Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); ; Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff)
  6. Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); ; Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff) Filing Party: Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #1
  7. Affidavit of Clayton Strickland in Support Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured, and Temporary Restraining Order Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); ; Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff) Case Motion #1: Motion for Preliminary Injunctive
  8. Affidavit of Counsel Christopher M Cromer Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); ; Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff)
  9. Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); ; Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff) Filing Party: Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #2
  10. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured and Temporary Restraining Order Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); ; Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff)
  11. [Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order (Linked to Motion #2) Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Case Motion #2: Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured
  12. First Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Declaratory Judgment or Alternatively to Quiet Title Christopher M Cromer (Attorney) on behalf of Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff)
  13. Partial Opposition to Motion for Expedited Consideration (linked to motion #2) Attorney: Stibitz, Brian J (0106043) Ronald Simkiss (Defendant); Case Motion #2: Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured
  14. Entry of Appearance Brian J Stibitz (Attorney) on behalf of Ronald Simkiss (Defendant)
  15. Attorney Information Attorney Stibitz, Brian J representing Defendant Simkiss, Ronald as of 06/10/2022
  16. Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction Brian J Stibitz (Attorney) on behalf of Ronald Simkiss (Defendant) Case Motion #1: Motion for Preliminary Injunctive
  17. Notice of Absence and Unavailability June 23, 2022 through June 29, 2022 Brian J Stibitz (Attorney) on behalf of Ronald Simkiss (Defendant)
  18. Attorney Information Attorney Burke, G Dana representing Defendant The State of Alaska Department of Natural Resource as of 06/15/2022
  19. Limited Entry of Appearance G Dana Burke (Attorney) on behalf of The State of Alaska Department of Natural Resource (Defendant)
  20. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #3
  21. Reply to Partial Opposition to Motion for Expedited Consideration (linked to motion #2) Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Case Motion #2: Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured
  22. Non-Opposed Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File his Reply to Defendant Simkiss' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Until 06/29/2022] Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #4
  23. Order Granting Non-Opposed Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File his Reply to Defendant Simkiss' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Until 06/29/2022] Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #4 Non-Opposed Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File his Reply to Defendant Simkiss' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Until 06/29/2022]
  24. Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Brian J Stibitz (Attorney) on behalf of Ronald Simkiss (Defendant) Case Motion #3: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
  25. Motion for Second Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File his Reply to Defendant Simkiss' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Until 06/30/2022] Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #5
  26. Reply to Partial Opposition to Motion for Expedited Consideration and Reply to Opposition for Preliminary Injunction [& Reply to Opposition to Temporary Restraining Order on Page 4] (linked to motions #1, #2, & #3) Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Case Motion #1: Motion for Preliminary Injunctive, Case Motion #2: Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured, Case Motion #3: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
  27. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Process Attorney: Burke, G Dana (9011085) The State of Alaska Department of Natural Resource (Defendant); Filing Party: The State of Alaska Department of Natural Resource Case Motion #6
  28. Non-Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Process (linked to motion #6) Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Case Motion #6: Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Process
  29. Order Granting to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Process The State of Alaska Department of Natural Resource Case Motion #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Process
  30. Order Granting for Second Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File his Reply to Defendant Simkiss' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Until 06/30/2022] Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #5 Motion for Second Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File his Reply to Defendant Simkiss' Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Until 06/30/2022]
  31. Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not SecuredDeemed Moot Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #2 Motion for Expedited Consideration in the Event that the Temporary Restraining Order is not Secured
  32. Request for Status Report
  33. Calendaring Notice 8/3/2022
  34. Motion Withdrawn - Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
  35. Motion Withdrawn - Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #1 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive
  36. Proposed Order Not Used Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #1 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive
  37. Proposed Order Not Used Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
  38. Stipulation to Dismiss the Action With Prejudice Attorney: Cromer, Christopher M (1311078) Attorney: Stibitz, Brian J (0106043) Clayton Elgin Strickland (Plaintiff); Ronald Simkiss (Defendant); Filing Party: Strickland, Clayton Elgin; Simkiss, Ronald Case Motion #7
  39. Order Granting Stipulation to Dismiss the Action With Prejudice Strickland, Clayton Elgin Case Motion #7 Stipulation to Dismiss the Action With Prejudice

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more