Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kankakee Co

Court

Kankakee Co

Illinois

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-05
Status Closed
Type Dc Dissolution With Children
Docket 18 entries
Disposition judgment
Photo of Hon. Jones, Marlow

Judge

Hon. Jones, Marlow

Kankakee County (IL)

Illinois

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. DISSOLUTION (WITH CHILDREN) Comment PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION (WITH CHILDREN) FILED BY Robert David Ruzich (Attorney) on behalf of MARK WHITESIDE (PETITIONER) Receipt: 452468 Date: Attorney: Robert David Ruzich
  2. CASE SCHEDULED Comment CASE SCHEDULED Event: CASE MANAGEMENT Date: Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  3. Case Management Original Type Case Management Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Continued Comment
  4. CASE CALLED Comment CASE CALLED. PETITIONER BY ATTORNEY RUZICH. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. CASE CONTINUED TO MARCH 12, 2024 AT 9:00am FOR STATUS. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  5. CASE SCHEDULED Comment CASE SCHEDULED Event: STATUS CHECK Date: Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  6. Proof of Service filed. Comment PROOF OF SERVICE FILED BY HFS
  7. Status Check Original Type Status Check Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Continued Comment
  8. CASE CALLED Comment CASE CALLED. AAG SHIELD FOR HFS. PETITIONER WITH ATTORNEY RUZICH. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. CASE CONTINUED TO APRIL 9, 2024 FOR STATUS ON CHILD SUPPORT. SEE ORDER SIGNED. (ATTORNEY RUZICH ALLOWED TO NOT APPEAR AT NEXT COURT DATE.) (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  9. CASE SCHEDULED Comment CASE SCHEDULED Event: STATUS CHECK Date: Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  10. Status Check Original Type Status Check Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Continued Comment
  11. CASE CALLED Comment CASE CALLED. PETITIONER BY ATTORNEY RUZICH. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. AAG SHIELD FOR HFS. CASE CONTINUED TO MAY 7, 2024 AT 9:30am FOR PROVE UP. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  12. CASE SCHEDULED Comment CASE SCHEDULED Event: HEARING FOR PROVE-UP Date: Time: 9:30 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  13. Hearing for Prove-UP Original Type Hearing for Prove-UP Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 09:30 AM Result Continued Comment
  14. CASE CALLED Comment CASE CALLED. PETITIONER WITH ATTORNEY RUZICH. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. AAG SHIELD FOR HFS. CASE CONTINUED TO MAY 14, 2024 AT 9:00am FOR PROVE UP. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  15. CASE SCHEDULED Comment CASE SCHEDULED Event: HEARING FOR PROVE-UP Date: Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: ORDER ENTERED
  16. Hearing for Prove-UP Original Type Hearing for Prove-UP Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Order Entered Comment
  17. JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION Comment JUDGMENT FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PRESENTED, SIGNED AND ORDERED FILED (JONES) JMC
  18. IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES Comment CASE CALLED FOR HEARING ON ALL MATTERS. PETITIONER APPEARS EARLIER WITH ATTORNEY RUZICH. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. WITNESS (RESPONDENT) SWORN, EVIDENCE HEARD. COURT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES AND SUBJECT MATTER. COURT FINDS GROUNDSFOR DISSOLUTION BASED UPON IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES. MARRIAGE DISSOLVED. AS TO ALL MATTERS, PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS TESTIFIED TO IN OPEN COURT AND CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT ORDER AND ALLOCATION JUDGMENT. FOR ALL DETAILS, SEE JUDGMENT ORDERS SIGNED.
 (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more