Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-17
Status Pending
Type 43 Cl <10 K Other Petition Civil Limited
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Quality Loan Service Corp.
Defendant Respondent all Claimants To Surplus Funds After Trustee S Sale Of Real Property Located At: 224 S Haley, Bakersfield, Ca 93307
Photo of Hon. Non, Fast Track

Judge

Hon. Non, Fast Track

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Requested By QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP. Unserved
  2. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  3. Comment Notice of Case Assignment
  4. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment GRANTING PETITIONTO DEPOSIT UNDISTRIBUTED SURPLUS PROCEEDS OF TRUSTEES SALE
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO SURPLUS FUNDS Reason: Form attached to the Petition on page 27 with instruction on page 25 to send the claim and documentation to McCarthy & Holthus LLP. ; Any electronic filing for the court cannot be a picture. These pictures have also been received horizontaly
  6. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Statement of Claim to Surplus Funds, W-9, Credit Authorization; Reason: This claim form, Tax form W-9 and Crdit Authorization are not to be filed with the Superior Court. Refer to the letter dated 9/23/2022 from the office of McCarthy Holthus. The letter states "please send your claim form and documentation to Mccarthy and Holthus LLP" Note the Credit Authorization reads " I (we) hereby authorize McCarthy & Holthus LLP to initiate entries to my account" These forms are filed with the office of McCarthy and Hotlhus LLP. NOTE: Document size are too large. The statement is 25.81 x 34.49 inches, W-9 Claim is 23.90 x 31.25 inches and the Credit Authorization is 23.60 x 30.92 inches.
  7. Comment Notice of Entry of Order
  8. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  9. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  10. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  11. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  12. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  13. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  14. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  15. Comment NOTICE OF HEARING
  16. View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 06/20/2023 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment RE DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS FUNDS
  17. View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 09/18/2023 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment RE DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS FUNDS Cont'd from 06/20/2023
  18. Comment DECLARATION IN RESPONSE TO OSC RE: DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS FUNDS
  19. View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 11/16/2023 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment RE DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS FUNDS Cont'd from 06/20/2023, 09/18/23

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more