Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fulton Co

Court

Fulton Co

Georgia

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-28
Status Closed
Type Gc General Complex
Docket 145 entries
Disposition not guilty

Parties

Plaintiff The State Of Georgia
Defendant David Nathan Thompson
Photo of Hon. Ingram, Shukura L

Judge

Hon. Ingram, Shukura L

Fulton County (GA)

Georgia

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CRIMINAL INDICTMENT
  2. View Document CRIMINAL INDICTMENT
  3. PRODUCTION ORDER
  4. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  5. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  6. PRODUCTION ORDER
  7. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  8. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  9. ENTRY/NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  10. View Document ENTRY/NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  11. Comment Entry of Appearance
  12. ENTRY/NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  13. View Document ENTRY/NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  14. Comment *
  15. CONSOLIDATED DISCOVERY REQUEST
  16. View Document CONSOLIDATED DISCOVERY REQUEST
  17. Comment *
  18. CONSOLIDATED MOTIONS
  19. View Document CONSOLIDATED MOTIONS
  20. Comment *
  21. PLEA AND ARRAIGNMENT
  22. Original Type PLEA AND ARRAIGNMENT
  23. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  24. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  25. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  26. Result FN TO CASE MGMT CALENDAR
  27. Comment CELL LOCATION: DOC CUSTODY AT TIME OF SCHEDULING. PLEA AND ARRAIGNMENT
  28. SCHEDULING ORDER
  29. View Document SCHEDULING ORDER
  30. Comment SCHEDULING ORDER
  31. ORG IND/ACC W/NOT GUILTY PLEA
  32. View Document ORIG/ACC W/NOT GUILTY PLEA
  33. CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING
  34. Original Type CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING
  35. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  36. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  37. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  38. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  39. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  40. Result FN TO FINAL PLEA
  41. Comment CELL LOCATION: 2S203 BK #: 2203679 CASE MANAGEMENT
  42. WORK COPY - NOT OFFICIAL CALENDAR
  43. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  44. PRODUCTION ORDER
  45. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  46. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  47. PRODUCTION ORDER
  48. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  49. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  50. FINAL PLEA
  51. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  52. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  53. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  54. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  55. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  56. Comment CPO DEKALB COUNTY PTC AND FINAL PLEA. PROBATION REVOCATION CASE 04SC16179
  57. PRODUCTION ORDER
  58. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  59. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  60. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
  61. View Document LEAVE OF ABSENCE
  62. Comment Leave of Absence
  63. FINAL PLEA
  64. Original Type FINAL PLEA
  65. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  66. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  67. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  68. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  69. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  70. Result ATTORNEY CONFLICT
  71. Comment FINAL PLEA
  72. MOTION/APPLICATION/PETITION FOR BOND
  73. View Document MOTION/APPLICATION/PETITION FOR BOND
  74. Comment Motion for Bond
  75. FINAL PLEA
  76. Original Type FINAL PLEA
  77. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  78. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  79. Result RESET AT PARTY REQUEST
  80. Comment FINAL PLEA
  81. ORDER DENYING BOND
  82. View Document ORDER DENYING BOND
  83. Comment 22SC180593 David Thompson Bond Denied
  84. PRODUCTION ORDER
  85. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  86. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  87. FINAL PLEA
  88. Original Type FINAL PLEA
  89. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  90. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  91. View Document JUDGE INGRAM VIRTUAL NOTICE
  92. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  93. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
  94. Result DEFENSE REQUESTED RESET
  95. Comment FINAL PLEA CPO DEKALB COUNTY
  96. PRODUCTION ORDER
  97. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  98. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  99. PRODUCTION ORDER
  100. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  101. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  102. PRODUCTION ORDER
  103. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  104. Comment 22SC180593-DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON-CPO
  105. FINAL PLEA
  106. Original Type FINAL PLEA
  107. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  108. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  109. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON HEARING
  110. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  111. Hearing Time 10:30 AM
  112. Result COURT RESET
  113. Comment FINAL PLEA CPO DEKALB COUNTY
  114. NOTICE
  115. View Document NOTICE
  116. Comment Conflict Notice
  117. ORDER
  118. View Document ORDER
  119. Comment ORDER - DEFENDANT TO APPEAR FOR COURT VIA ZOOM
  120. FINAL PLEA
  121. Original Type FINAL PLEA
  122. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON NOTICE 2022
  123. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON NOTICE 2022
  124. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON NOTICE 2022
  125. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  126. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  127. Result COURT RESET
  128. Comment FINAL PLEA
  129. PRODUCTION ORDER
  130. View Document PRODUCTION ORDER
  131. Comment 22SC180593- DAVID NATHAN THOMPSON- CPO
  132. FINAL PLEA
  133. Original Type FINAL PLEA
  134. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON NOTICE 2022
  135. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON NOTICE 2022
  136. View Document JUDGE INGRAM IN PERSON NOTICE 2022
  137. Judicial Officer INGRAM, SHUKURA L
  138. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  139. Result PLEA ENTERED
  140. Comment FINAL PLEA RESET TO BRING DEF. FROM DEKALB CO
  141. FINAL DEFENDANT DISPOSITION
  142. View Document FINAL DEFENDANT DISPOSITION
  143. Comment SIGNED BY JUDGE INGRAM
  144. ORIG ACC/IND W/JOINDER
  145. View Document INDICTMENT/ ACC. WITH SIGNED JOINDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more