Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-13
Status Closed
Type Civil District Court (3 An)|Other Tort
Docket 27 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Stp Anchorage Llc
Defendant Newby, Lyle R|Bagron, Terri M
Photo of Hon. Chung, Jo Ann M

Judge

Hon. Chung, Jo Ann M

Anchorage Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Initial Judicial Assignment: Honorable Jo-Ann Chung
  2. Complaint for Personal Injury and/or Property Damages Not Automobile Related Receipt: 1984917 Date: 07/13/2022
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Attorney Information Attorney DeNoble, Brad D representing Plaintiff(s) STP Anchorage LLC as of 07/13/2022 Brad D DeNoble (Attorney) on behalf of STP Anchorage LLC (Plaintiff)
  5. Return of Service - Summons Served On: Lyle R Newby (Defendant);
  6. Return of Service - Summons Served On: Terri M Bagron (Defendant);
  7. Motion for Default Judgment Attorney: DeNoble, Brad D (9806009) STP Anchorage LLC (Plaintiff); Filing Party: STP Anchorage LLC Case Motion #1
  8. Affidavit of Brad D. De Noble Brad D DeNoble (Attorney) on behalf of STP Anchorage LLC (Plaintiff)
  9. Reason for Returned Mail:---vacant Date Returned Documents Were Distributed:----09/15/2022 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved:----Notice of Hearing Terri M Bagron (Defendant);
  10. Order Regarding Default Judgment and Attorney's Fees Judge: Chung, Jo Ann Case Motion #1: Motion for Default Judgment
  11. Order Granting Motion Case Motion #1: Motion for Default Judgment
  12. Entry of Default Granted Against: Lyle R Newby (Defendant); Terri M Bagron (Defendant); Judge: Chung, Jo Ann
  13. Default Judgment Entered against: Lyle R Newby (Defendant); Terri M Bagron (Defendant); Judge: Chung, Jo Ann
  14. First Free Copy E-mailed to: Brad D DeNoble (Attorney) on behalf of STP Anchorage LLC (Plaintiff)
  15. Default Judgment for Plaintiff Granted by Judge
  16. Reason for Returned Mail:-----Return to Sender Date Returned Documents Were Distributed:-----09/15/2022 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved:-----Notice of Hearing Lyle R Newby (Defendant);
  17. Judgment Entered Default Judgment Amount: 3,661.76 Pre-Default Judgment Interest: 27.39 Attorney Fees: 0.00 Court Costs: 885.48 Other Fees: 0.00 Default Judgment Total: 4,574.63 Total Accrued Costs: 0.00 Total Accrued Interest: 0.00 Terms: %3.25 Type: Default Judgment Judge: Chung, Jo-Ann M Default Judgment Date: 10/03/2022 Default Judgment Time: 12:00PM Referee: Recommendation Date: Default Judgment Status: Judgment Entered Default Judgment For: STP Anchorage LLC - Plaintiff Default Judgment Against: Bagron, Terri M - Defendant ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Newby, Lyle R - Defendant ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Default Judgment Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Default Judgment Balance: 4,574.63 Case Total: 0.00 Case Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Case Balance: 0.00
  18. Reason for Returned Mail: Attempted - Not Known - Unable to Forward Date Returned Documents Were Distributed: 10/3/2022 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved: Order Regarding Default Judgment and Attorney's Fees; Entry of Default; Default Judgment for Plaintiff Lyle R Newby (Defendant);
  19. Writ of Execution Fee (AdR 9(e)(10)) Receipt: 2015213 Date: 10/19/2022
  20. Accounting Deficiency Notice - The correct judgment date. The judgment date on the Information for Issuance of Writ that you filed does not match the effective date of the judgment. Accounting Deficiency Notice (6/17) Sent on: 10/21/2022 13:19:08.72
  21. Information for Writ of Execution Brad D DeNoble (Attorney) on behalf of STP Anchorage LLC (Plaintiff)
  22. Writ of Execution (CIV-500) Issued North Country Process
  23. Full Return of Service on Writ of Execution North Country Process
  24. Writ of Execution (CIV-500) Issued - Corrected name spell North Country Process
  25. Return of Service on Execution - No Funds North Country Process - Costs: $100.00 Lyle R Newby (Defendant);
  26. Certificate of Service Brad D DeNoble (Attorney) on behalf of STP Anchorage LLC (Plaintiff)
  27. Return of Service on PFD - No Money Seized North Country Process - Cost $50.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.