Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-02
Status ACTIVE - ACTIVE
Type Af Appellate Felony
Docket 182 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hughes, Martha J|Wann, Jeremy Dwain
Defendant State Of Arkansas|Attorney General|Johnson, Darnisa C Evans|Kane, Shirley Rebecca Bailey|Zangari, Michael Charlie
Photo of Hon. Shirron Stephen L

Judge

Hon. Shirron Stephen L

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. RECORD TENDERED
  2. 3 volumes; 583 pages.
  3. No Images
  4. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  5. none.
  6. No Images
  7. MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK
  8. Appellant's motion for rule on clerk and resetting briefing schedule.
  9. MOTION
  10. MOTION SUBMITTED
  11. Appellant's motion for rule on clerk and resetting briefing schedule.
  12. No Images
  13. RECORD LODGED
  14. 3 volumes; 593 pages.
  15. No Images
  16. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  17. Appellant's motion for rule on clerk and resetting briefing schedule is granted. Attorney Jonathan B. Huber is referred to the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct. Record filed in Arkansas Court of Appeals this date, as case no. CR-22-269. Appellant's brief will be due by June 27, 2022; appellee's brief due thirty days after appellant's brief is filed; appellant's reply brief due fifteen days thereafter.
  18. ORDER
  19. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  20. Appellant's brief is due June 27, 2022.
  21. No Images
  22. MOTION WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  23. Motion of Jonathan Huber to withdraw as attorney for appellant.
  24. MOTION
  25. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  26. Appellant's motion for extension of time.
  27. MOTION
  28. BRIEF EXTENSION
  29. Appellant's brief is due July 27, 2022.
  30. ORDER
  31. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  32. Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief.
  33. MOTION
  34. BRIEF EXTENSION
  35. Appellant's brief is due September 25, 2022.
  36. ORDER
  37. MOTION SUBMITTED
  38. Motion of Johathan Huber to withdraw as attorney for appellant.
  39. No Images
  40. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  41. Motion of Johathan Huber to withdraw as attorney for appellant is granted. Attorney Jeremy Wann is appointed as counsel for the appellant. Appellant's brief is due in forty days (October 10, 2022).
  42. ORDER
  43. RECORD CHECKED OUT
  44. 5 volumes checked out and mailed to attorney
  45. Transcript check out
  46. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  47. Appointment of new counsel. Appellant's brief is due in forty days (October 10, 2022).
  48. No Images
  49. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  50. Appellant's brief is due October 17, 2022 after 7-day brief extension request by counsel via telephone.
  51. No Images
  52. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  53. Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief.
  54. MOTION
  55. BRIEF EXTENSION
  56. Appellant's brief is due November 16, 2022.
  57. ORDER
  58. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  59. Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief.
  60. MOTION
  61. BRIEF EXTENSION
  62. Appellant's brief is due November 21, 2022.
  63. ORDER
  64. NO MERIT BRIEF FILED
  65. Paper copies due 11/26/22.
  66. BRIEF
  67. MOT RELIEV AS COUNS NO MERIT
  68. Motion of Jeremy D. Wann to be relieved as counsel of record.
  69. MOTION
  70. LETT TO APPLLNT 30 DAYS TO RES
  71. Motion of Jeremy D. Wann to be relieved as counsel of record, no merit brief, affidavit, and letter stating appellant's pro se points are due in thirty days (December 22, 2022) mailed to appellant's address of record.
  72. LETTER
  73. RECORD CHECKED IN
  74. 5 volumes returned.
  75. No Images
  76. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  77. Letter mailed to appellant to return in 30 day returned, marked unable to forward.
  78. No Images
  79. LETT TO APPLLNT 30 DAYS TO RES
  80. Appellant's pro se points are due January, 4 2023. Second attempt. Pro se points for reversal packet mailed to the appellant at P.O. Box 233, Ozark, AR 72949.
  81. LETTER
  82. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT
  83. Green card signed and returned.
  84. OTHER
  85. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  86. Entry of appearance by Michael Charles Zangari on behalf of appellee.
  87. OTHER
  88. APPELLEE WILL NOT FILE BRIEF
  89. Letter stating appellee will not file a brief.
  90. LETTER
  91. CASE SUBMITTED
  92. none.
  93. No Images
  94. OPINION - OTHER
  95. Motion to withdraw denied; rebriefing in merit format ordered. Harrison, C.J., and Virden, J., agree.
  96. OPINION
  97. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  98. Motion to withdraw denied, rebriefing in merit format ordered. Harrison, C.J., and Virden, J., agree. See opinion issued this date. Appellant's substituted brief is due in forty days (July 10, 2023). Appellee's brief is due thirty days after the filing of the appellant's brief. Reply brief is due fifteen days thereafter.
  99. ORDER
  100. CLERK NOTE
  101. Opinion mailed to Martha J Hughes at Franklin Co. 309, 101 W. Main Ozark, Ar. 72949
  102. No Images
  103. OPINION PANEL
  104. none.
  105. No Images
  106. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  107. Motion to withdraw denied, rebriefing in merit format ordered. Harrison, C.J., and Virden, J., agree. See opinion issued this date. Appellant's substituted brief is due in forty days (July 10, 2023). Appellee's brief is due thirty days after the filing of the appellant's brief. Reply brief is due fifteen days thereafter.
  108. No Images
  109. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  110. Mail to the appellant returned undeliverable to address at 101 W. Main Ozark, A72949. Address of record updated this date and remailed to 2749 Airport Rd, Ozark AR 72949
  111. No Images
  112. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  113. Mail sent to 101 W. Main Ozark AR 72949 on June 5, 2023 returned this date. "Return to sender/no such number/unable to forward" Opinion mailed Mailed May 31, 2023 returned "return to sender/vacant/unable to forward." Mailed to the same address.
  114. No Images
  115. MOTION TO FILE BELATED BRIEF
  116. Appellant's motion for late filing and extension of time to file.
  117. MOTION
  118. BRIEF TENDERED
  119. Belated Motion Pending
  120. No Images
  121. MOTION SUBMITTED
  122. Appellant's motion for late filing and extension of time to file.
  123. No Images
  124. LETTER ORDERS - COA
  125. Appellant's motion for late filing and extension of time to file is granted. Tendered appellant's brief filed this date.
  126. ORDER
  127. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  128. Appellant's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  129. BRIEF
  130. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  131. Entry of appearance of Rebecca Kane, Assistant Attorney General, on behalf of the appellee.
  132. MOTION
  133. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  134. Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney.
  135. BRIEF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more