Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Orange Co

Court

Orange Co

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-22
Type Civil Rights
Docket 45 entries
Disposition case dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Michael Kim|Richard Rios
Defendant Cecilia Hupp|Cecilla Hupp|City Of Brea|Glenn Parker|L. Christine Marick|Marty Simonoff|Steven Vargas
Photo of Hon. Lewis Gregory

Judge

Hon. Lewis Gregory

Orange County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. E-FILING TRANSACTION 1954756 RECEIVED ON 02/22/2022 04:24:53 PM.
  2. COMPLAINT DISPOSED WITH DISPOSITION OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL.
  3. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - ENTIRE ACTION FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 05/18/2023
  4. E-FILING TRANSACTION 11143920 RECEIVED ON 05/18/2023 11:32:04 AM.
  5. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 12/22/2022 08:30:00 AM.
  6. THE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR 06/01/2023 AT 08:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT N15.
  7. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED BY CITY OF BREA; GLENN PARKER; L. CHRISTINE MARICK; MARTY SIMONOFF; STEVEN VARGAS; HUPP, CECILIA ON 12/20/2022
  8. E-FILING TRANSACTION 11079326 RECEIVED ON 12/20/2022 03:05:35 PM.
  9. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 10/27/2022 08:30:00 AM.
  10. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CONTINUED TO 12/22/2022 AT 08:30 AM IN THIS DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO COURT'S MOTION.
  11. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY CITY OF BREA ON 10/25/2022
  12. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31224264 RECEIVED ON 10/25/2022 04:37:52 PM.
  13. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 10/18/2022
  14. E-FILING TRANSACTION 41399497 RECEIVED ON 10/18/2022 11:09:26 PM.
  15. NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE
  16. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/27/2022 AT 08:30:00 AM IN N15 AT NORTH JUSTICE CENTER.
  17. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE REASSIGNED TO N15 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ON 10/24/2022 AT 08:30:00 AM.
  18. CASE REASSIGNED TO NATHAN VU EFFECTIVE 08/15/2022.
  19. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 07/25/2022 08:30:00 AM.
  20. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CONTINUED TO 10/24/2022 AT 08:30 AM IN THIS DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO PARTY'S MOTION.
  21. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/24/2022 AT 08:30:00 AM IN C22 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  22. NOTICE OF DEPARTMENT CHANGE
  23. DECLARATION - OTHER (RE MEET AND CONFER) FILED BY CITY OF BREA; CECILLA HUPP; GLENN PARKER; L. CHRISTINE MARICK; MARTY SIMONOFF; STEVEN VARGAS ON 04/21/2022
  24. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21150170 RECEIVED ON 04/21/2022 08:53:24 PM.
  25. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/24/2022
  26. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31135854 RECEIVED ON 03/24/2022 01:19:24 PM.
  27. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/24/2022
  28. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31135853 RECEIVED ON 03/24/2022 01:19:24 PM.
  29. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/24/2022
  30. E-FILING TRANSACTION 1967558 RECEIVED ON 03/24/2022 01:19:23 PM.
  31. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/24/2022
  32. E-FILING TRANSACTION 41313869 RECEIVED ON 03/24/2022 01:19:23 PM.
  33. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/24/2022
  34. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21138369 RECEIVED ON 03/24/2022 01:19:22 PM.
  35. PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/24/2022
  36. E-FILING TRANSACTION 1967557 RECEIVED ON 03/24/2022 01:19:22 PM.
  37. E-FILING TRANSACTION NUMBER 21136481 REJECTED.
  38. SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 03/21/2022
  39. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31133949 RECEIVED ON 03/21/2022 11:34:38 AM.
  40. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED BY KIM, MICHAEL; RIOS, RICHARD ON 02/24/2022
  41. E-FILING TRANSACTION 1955686 RECEIVED ON 02/24/2022 11:57:43 AM.
  42. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 07/25/2022 AT 08:30:00 AM IN C26 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  43. CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDICIAL OFFICER LEWIS, GREGORY ON 02/22/2022.
  44. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY LEGALCONNECT FOR 194 - COMPLAINT OR OTHER 1ST PAPER IN THE AMOUNT OF 435.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 13011812 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12839761.
  45. COMPLAINT FILED BY RIOS, RICHARD; KIM, MICHAEL ON 02/22/2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more