Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-01
Status Pending
Type 07 Cv Business Tort Civil Unlimited
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Michel, Julie
Defendant Jimenez, Diana
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 03/15/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: T2
  2. Unserved
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  7. Comment RE: Failure to Appear Hearing: 9/30/2024 8:30 a.m. T-2
  8. Comment Re: Dismissal and/or Imposition of Sanctions Hearing Date: 9/30/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  9. Comment as to Diana Jimenez via sub service
  10. Original Type Further Case Management Conference View Document Further Case Management Conference 09/30/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Continued from 05/29/2024
  11. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment Continued from 03/15/2024,05/29/2024
  12. Original Type Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) View Document Further Case Management Conference 09/30/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment re: Sanctions directed to Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions $250 pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30 for FTA at the OSC and CMC on 05/29/2024 and FTC with CRC, Rules 3.110, 3.720 - 3.730.
  13. Original Type Order to Appear View Document Further Case Management Conference 09/30/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment As to Plaintiff for failure to appear at he OSC 3.110 and CMC on 05/29/24
  14. Comment Re: Imposition of Sanctions Hearing Date: 1/9/25 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  15. Original Type Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 01/09/2025 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment re: Sanctions directed to Defendant to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions in the amount of $250.00 pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30 for FTA at the CMC on 09/30/2024 and failure to comply with California Rules of Court, Rules 3.720 - 3.730
  16. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment $250.00
  17. View Document Mandatory Settlement Conference 03/21/2025 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 11:00 AM Result Held
  18. View Document Mandatory Settlement Conference 03/21/2025 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment RE: WHY ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN FOR DEFENDANT HAVING MULTIPLE FTAs AND FOR ABANDONMNET OF CASE
  19. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 9:00 AM Comment TE: 2 DAYS
  20. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 09:00 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more