Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-16
Status Pending
Type 23 Cv Other Pi/pd/wd Civil Unlimited
Docket 86 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bravo, Heron, Jr.|Bravo, Erasmo|Bravo, Evangelina|Bravo, Manuel|Bravo, Mary|Evangelina Bravo, As Successor In Interest To Heron Bravo, Deceased|Heron Bravo, Jr., As Successor In Interest To Heron Bravo, Deceased|Erasmo Bravo, As Successor In Interest To Heron Bravo, Deceased
Defendant Carlon, Abel|Golden Empire Security|Vallejo, Anthony|Cross golden Empire Security, Inc.|Cross vallejo, Anthony|Cross carlon, Abel
Photo of Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Judge

Hon. Pulskamp Gregory

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 03/05/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: 17
  2. Unserved Served 12/02/20238:01 AM Served 11/29/20234:19 PM Served 11/30/20237:15 PM
  3. Comment as to Golden Empire Security via personal service
  4. Comment as to La Mina Cantina via personal service
  5. Comment as to Anthony Vallejo via personal service
  6. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Motion to Strike: Your Motion has been filed but not calendared. This Motion is to be heard in Department 17 which is located at 1415 Truxtun Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301. Please notice your Motion with the correct court Location. Also First Appearance fees are due with the First Documents filed. There will be a Notice of insufficient Filing fees sent out. Total due $435 plus $25 fee minus the $60 submitted with this Motion= $400
  11. Comment Amended Notice of Defendant La Mina Cantinas Notice And Motion To Strike Allegations From Plaintiffs Complaint (Motions)
  12. Comment Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Strike
  13. Comment Defendant La Mina Cantinas Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Strike Allegations From Plaintiffs Complaint (Comment)
  14. View Document Motion to Strike 02/14/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 1/16/24 Defendant; LA MINA Motion to Strike
  15. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  16. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment First Amended Complaint filed is not legible. Please review/correct and re-file.
  17. View Document Ruling 03/20/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 03:30 PM Result Ruling
  18. Unserved Unserved Unserved Unserved
  19. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- First Amended Complaint filed 03/18/2024. First Amended Complaint supersedes complaint filed 11/16/2023. Caption under the case number does not reflect the operative complaint. Cross complaint - Review format of first page 2.111
  20. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- First Amended Complaint filed 03/18/2024. First Amended Complaint supersedes complaint filed 11/16/2023. Caption under the case number does not reflect the operative complaint. Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review verbiage as to all parties including the " does". Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint.
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- First Amended Complaint filed 03/18/2024. First Amended Complaint supersedes complaint filed 11/16/2023. Caption under the case number does not reflect the operative complaint. Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review verbiage as to all parties including the " does". Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint.
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT: OUTDATED FORM. PLEASE USE FORM CM-110 WITH DATE REV. JANUARY 1, 2024
  23. Comment for Plaintiffs
  24. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: La Mina Cantina Case Management Statement. The form is outdated.
  25. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint- caption listing cross defendants does not conform to the body. Summons does not conform exact to complaint. Please review party information (including does information).
  26. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment *Second rejection*-Cross complaint- caption listing cross defendants does not conform to the body. Verbiage as to "Golden" is cut off.
  27. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 05/09/2024
  28. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Please ensure the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information conforms to the caption and the body of the complaint. True name is to be consistent throughout. *Answer- Defendants name does not conform to complaint. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated. Review/Correct and re-submit .
  29. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Review CRC 2.111 as to the format of the first page. All cross actions are not listed.
  30. Comment PROOF OF SERVICE
  31. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Review CRC 2.111 as to the format of the first page. All cross actions are not listed.
  32. View Document Ruling 05/15/2024 Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Ruling
  33. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Review CRC 2.111 as to the format of the first page. All cross actions are not listed. Cross complaint filed 05/09/2024. The answer filed has already declared the erroneously sued party. The cross complaint and summons is to reflect the true name.
  34. Comment The case is re-assigned to Judge Gregory Pulskamp in Division J for all purposes
  35. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 05/16/2024
  36. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Ruling 05/15/2024 View Document Case Management Conference 05/20/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  37. Comment Defendant/Cross-Complainant's Notice of Case Management Conference
  38. Comment of Cross Complaint as to Anthony Vallejo via personal service
  39. Comment and Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed
  40. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Missing Mandatory Judicial Council Form POS-010. Please attach the Notice of Acknowledgment and Receipt behind the POS-010 as one document filing. Please review
  41. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- All cross actions are not listed. Review CRC 2.111. Review Standing order filed 04/05/2024- Case number STO-24-0003 (In Re: Designation of civil documents as confidential in e-filing system.
  42. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Caption as to cross complaint filed 05/16/2024 does not conform exact. Review verbiage as to all parties including the " does". Please ensure caption conforms exact.
  43. Comment of Golden Empire Security Inc.
  44. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Re: OSC Sanctions for Failure to Appear, Hearing is Vacated
  45. Comment of La Mina Cantina **STRICKEN* see ruling dated 07/12/2024.
  46. View Document Ruling 07/12/2024 Hearing Time 03:00 PM Result Ruling
  47. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- See ruling dated 07/12/2024.
  48. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Please ensure the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information conforms to the body of the answer and caption under the case number. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated. Party is being listed as GOLDEN EMPIRE SECURITY and GOLDEN EMPIRE SECURITY INC. True name is to be consistent throughout.
  49. Comment of La Mina Cantina
  50. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Missing Mandatory Judicial Council Form POS-010. Please attach the Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt behind the POS-010 as one filing. Please review
  51. Comment Anthony Vallejo's Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint
  52. Comment Anthony Vallejo's Cross-Complaint
  53. Comment Anthony Vallejo's Answer To La Mina's Cross-Complaint
  54. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 08/16/2024
  55. View Document Further Case Management Conference 08/19/2024 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment cont'df from 05/20/24
  56. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment OSC Re: Imposition of Monetary Sanctions in the amount of $250 as to Plaintiffs' counsel Mark Joseph Whittington for FTA at CMC hearing on May 20, 2024.
  57. Comment Defendant/Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant's Notice of Jury Deposit - $150.00
  58. Comment Defendant/Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant's Notice of Change of Address
  59. Comment Failure to post will result in an automatic waiver of jury trial.
  60. Comment Defendant/Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendants Notice of Change of Address
  61. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Caption as to complaint filed 05/16/2024 does not conform exact. Review the "does" verbiage. Correct and re-submit
  62. Comment of Anthony Vallejo
  63. Comment Notice of Proof of Service of Defendant La Mina Cantina's Application for Determination for Good Faith Settlement
  64. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Comment Any and all cross-complaints and/or claims for implied equitable indemnity and/or contribution against LA MINA CANTINA are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
  65. Comment Notice of Non-Opposition to Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement Pursuant to CCP 877.6(a)(1)
  66. Comment with prejudice as to the only Defendant La Mina Cantina
  67. Comment Amended with prejudice as to Defendant La Mina Cantina, ONLY
  68. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 10:00 AM Comment FCMC 9/12/25, JT 9/15/25, T/E; 12 Days (Div. J)
  69. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 02:30 PM Comment jury trial 09/15/2025 jury for plaintiff t/e: 12 days
  70. Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 09:30 AM Comment jury for plaintiff t/e: 12 days

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more