Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-09-20
Type Adoption
Docket 32 entries
Disposition affirmed

Docket Entries

  1. Opinion Certified Serve: Carson, Amy Serve: Jeter, Christopher Serve: Keiffner, Gillian Serve: Stoesz, Timothy Serve: Zigenfus, Jacob Notice Date: 05/23/2023
  2. Document Transmitted
  3. Opinion Issued Opinion OPINION: Affirmed - Bailey, J. Brown, J., and Weissmann, J., concur. Judicial Officer: Bailey, Lloyd Mark Serve: Carson, Amy Serve: Jeter, Christopher Serve: Keiffner, Gillian Serve: Stoesz, Timothy Serve: Zigenfus, Jacob File Stamp: 03/29/2023
  4. Document Transmitted
  5. Received from Trial Court/Agency Clerk Volumes of Transcripts - One (1) Received By-Hand Delivered 03/02/2023 Postmark: 03/01/2023
  6. Corrected Entry Entry showing receipt of conventional exhibit volume is corrected to show it was received via mail.
  7. Received from Trial Court/Agency Clerk Volumes of Exhibits - One (1) Received By-Mailed 03/02/23 Postmark: 03/01/2023
  8. Case Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 03/02/2023
  9. Transmitted to Court of Appeals
  10. Electronic Documents Received from Trial Court Clerk. Volumes of Transcripts - Two (2) Volumes of Exhibits - One (1) Volumes of T/C - One (1) Received Electronically 2/28/2023 Postmark: 02/28/2023
  11. Note Trial court indicated it would mail the media exhibit volume.
  12. Trial Court Clerk Notified to Transmit Transcript Date Sent: 02/14/2023
  13. Document Transmitted
  14. Brief and Appendix - Appellee Volumes of Appendix: 2 Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/19/23 Attorney: Stoesz, Timothy Party: M, T File Stamp: 01/19/2023
  15. Appearance Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/03/22 Attorney: Stoesz, Timothy Party: M, T File Stamp: 01/03/2023
  16. Brief - Appellant Certificate of Service- Mailed 12/19/22 Attorney: Carson, Amy Attorney: Jeter, Christopher Attorney: Keiffner, Gillian Attorney: Zigenfus, Jacob Party: K, W File Stamp: 12/19/2022
  17. Notice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Appellant's Brief Party: K, W Serve: Carson, Amy Serve: Jeter, Christopher Serve: Keiffner, Gillian Serve: M, T Serve: Stoesz, Timothy Serve: Zigenfus, Jacob File Stamp: 12/19/2022
  18. Document Transmitted
  19. Received Document Receive Date: 12/15/22 Brief of Appellant - certificate of service date not update to reflect service date of corrected document and method of service is not clearly stated. Defect Not Cured. PostmarkDate: 12/15/2022
  20. Notice of Defect Not Cured Letter Issued Clerk Comments: certificate of service date not update to reflect service date of corrected document and method of service is not clearly stated. Defect Not Cured. Party: K, W Serve: Carson, Amy Serve: Jeter, Christopher Serve: Keiffner, Gillian Serve: M, T Serve: Zigenfus, Jacob Issue Date: 12/16/2022
  21. Document Transmitted
  22. Notice of Defect Issued Appellant's Brief Party: K, W Serve: Carson, Amy Serve: Jeter, Christopher Serve: Keiffner, Gillian Serve: Zigenfus, Jacob Issue Date: 12/15/2022
  23. Document Transmitted
  24. Received Document Receive Date: 12/13/22 Brief of Appellant - appealed order should be a separate PDF attachment, certificate of service states incorrect document being served. PostmarkDate: 12/13/2022
  25. Appendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: Three (3) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 12/13/22 Attorney: Carson, Amy Attorney: Jeter, Christopher Attorney: Zigenfus, Jacob Party: K, W File Stamp: 12/13/2022
  26. Corrected Entry Incorrect method of services stated in entry for appellant's appendix.
  27. Appendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: Three (3) Certificate of Service-Mailed 12/13/22 Attorney: Carson, Amy Attorney: Jeter, Christopher Attorney: Zigenfus, Jacob Party: K, W File Stamp: 12/13/2022
  28. Notice of Completion of Transcript Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 11/14/22 File Stamp: 11/14/2022
  29. Notice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Yet Completed Certificate of Service- Method not specified 09/22/22 File Stamp: 09/22/2022
  30. Notice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service-Method not Specified 09/19/22 *as stated* Attorney: Carson, Amy Attorney: Jeter, Christopher Attorney: Keiffner, Gillian Attorney: Zigenfus, Jacob Party: K, W File Stamp: 09/20/2022
  31. NOA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 09/20/2022
  32. Document Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more