Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kankakee Co

Court

Kankakee Co

Illinois

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-03
Status Closed
Type Dc Dissolution With Children
Docket 23 entries
Disposition judgment
Photo of Hon. Jones, Marlow

Judge

Hon. Jones, Marlow

Kankakee County (IL)

Illinois

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE SCHEDULED Event: CASE MANAGEMENT Date: 03/09/2023 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  2. APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES FILED. PRO SE (Attorney) on behalf of ELIZABETH MARIE ARNET (PETITIONER)
  3. CERTIFICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM E-FILING FILED. PRO SE (Attorney) on behalf of ELIZABETH MARIE ARNET (PETITIONER)
  4. SUMMONS ISSUED
  5. Issue Date: 01/03/2023 Service: SUMMONS Method: PERSONAL SERVICE Provider: FOREIGN SERVER Cost Per: $ ARNET, CLINT EDWARD Tracking No: P000089936
  6. ORDER FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES SIGNED AND FILED - APPLICATION ALLOWED VOICEMAIL 1/4/2022
  7. CASE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE. RESPONDENT NOT SERVED. CASE CONTINUED TO APRIL 28, 2023 AT 9:00am FOR STATUS OF SERVICE ON RESPONDENT. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  8. CASE SCHEDULED Event: STATUS OF SERVICE ON RESPONDENT Date: 04/28/2023 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  9. CASE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE AND STATES RESPONDENT WAS SERVED 4/27/23 AND IS CURRENTLY IN CUSDOTY IN MICHIGAN. CASE CONTINUED TO JUNE 2, 2023 AT 9:00am FOR STATUS. PETITIONER TO NOTIFY RESPONDENT OF NEW COURT DATE. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  10. CASE SCHEDULED Event: STATUS CHECK Date: 06/02/2023 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  11. CORRESPONDENCE FILED BY CLINT EDWARD ARNET (RESPONDENT);
  12. MOTION FILED BY PRO SE (Attorney) on behalf of ELIZABETH MARIE ARNET (PETITIONER)
  13. NOTICE OF COURT DATE FOR MOTION FILED BY PRO SE (Attorney) on behalf of ELIZABETH MARIE ARNET (PETITIONER)
  14. CASE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE. RESPONDENT APPEARS NOT. CASE CONTINUED TO JULY 10, 2023 AT 9:30am FOR HEARING ON DEFAULT PROVE UP. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  15. CASE SCHEDULED Event: HEARING FOR PROVE-UP Date: 07/10/2023 Time: 9:30 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: ORDER ENTERED
  16. NOTICE OF COURT DATE FOR MOTION FILED BY PRO SE (Attorney) on behalf of ELIZABETH MARIE ARNET (PETITIONER)
  17. CASE CALLED FOR HEARING ON ALL MATTERS. PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE. RESPONDENT CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY. COURT NOTES CORRESPONDENCE FROM RESPONDENT STATING HE WANTS THE DIVORCE. WITNESS SWORN, EVIDENCE HEARD. COURT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES AND SUBJECT MATTER. COURT FINDS GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTION BASED UPON IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES. MARRIAGE DISSOLVED. AS TO ALL MATTERS, PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS TESTIFIED TO IN OPEN COURT AND CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT ORDER AND PARENTING PLAN. FOR ALL DETAILS, SEE ORDERS SIGNED. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  18. JUDGMENT FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PRESENTED, SIGNED AND ORDERED FILED (JONES) JMC
  19. CASE CALLED Comment CASE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE. RESPONDENT APPEARS NOT. CASE CONTINUED TO JULY 10, 2023 AT 9:30am FOR HEARING ON DEFAULT PROVE UP. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  20. CASE SCHEDULED Comment CASE SCHEDULED Event: HEARING FOR PROVE-UP Date: Time: 9:30 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: ORDER ENTERED
  21. Hearing for Prove-UP Original Type Hearing for Prove-UP Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 09:30 AM Result Order Entered Comment
  22. Parenting Plan filed. Comment PARENTING PLAN PRESENTED, SIGNED AND FILED (JONES) JMC
  23. IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES Comment CASE CALLED FOR HEARING ON ALL MATTERS. PETITIONER APPEARS PRO SE. RESPONDENT CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY. COURT NOTES CORRESPONDENCE FROM RESPONDENT STATING HE WANTS THE DIVORCE. WITNESS SWORN, EVIDENCE HEARD. COURT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES AND SUBJECT MATTER. COURT FINDS GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTION BASED UPON IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES. MARRIAGE DISSOLVED. AS TO ALL MATTERS, PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS TESTIFIED TO IN OPEN COURT AND CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT ORD ER AND PARENTING PLAN. FOR ALL DETAILS, SEE ORDERS SIGNED. 
 (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more