Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kankakee Co

Court

Kankakee Co

Illinois

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-05
Status Closed
Type Dc Dissolution With Children
Docket 15 entries
Disposition judgment
Photo of Hon. Jones, Marlow

Judge

Hon. Jones, Marlow

Kankakee County (IL)

Illinois

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR CHILD SUPPORT FILED BY Jeffrey Michael Godin (Attorney) on behalf of DANA COOPER (PETITIONER)
  2. CASE SCHEDULED Event: CASE MANAGEMENT Date: 07/27/2023 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: CONTINUED
  3. APPEARANCE FILED BY Cordell Law LLP (Attorney) on behalf of AARON COOPER (RESPONDENT) Receipt: 439066 Date: 06/12/2023
  4. COUNTER PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE FILED BY Cordell Law LLP (Attorney) on behalf of AARON COOPER (RESPONDENT) Receipt: 439066 Date: 06/12/2023
  5. PROOF OF SERVICE FILED BY Jeffrey Michael Godin (Attorney) on behalf of DANA COOPER (PETITIONER)
  6. PROOF OF SERVICE FILED BY Jeffrey Michael Godin (Attorney) on behalf of DANA COOPER (PETITIONER)
  7. CASE CALLED. PETITIONER WITH ATTORNEY GODIN. RESPONDENT WITH ATTORNEY DUVALL. CASE CONTINUED TO AUGUST 28, 2023 AT 9:30am FOR PROVE UP. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  8. CASE SCHEDULED Event: HEARING FOR PROVE-UP Date: 08/28/2023 Time: 9:30 am Judge: JONES, MARLOW Location: ROOM 104 Result: ORDER ENTERED
  9. MOTION TO WITHDRAW FILED. Jeffrey Michael Godin (Attorney) on behalf of DANA COOPER (PETITIONER)
  10. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED BY Jeffrey Michael Godin (Attorney) on behalf of DANA COOPER (PETITIONER)
  11. CASE CALLED FOR HEARING ON ALL MATTERS. PETITIONER WITH ATTORNEY GODIN. RESPONDENT WITH ATTORNEY JONES-MAY. ATTORNEY GODIN'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW ALLOWED. WITNESS SWORN, EVIDENCE HEARD. COURT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES AND SUBJECT MATTER. COURT FINDS GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTION BASED UPON IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES. MARRIAGE DISSOLVED. AS TO ALL MATTERS, PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS TESTIFIED TO IN OPEN COURT AND CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT ORDER, MARITAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND ALLOCATION JUDGMENT. FOR ALL DETAILS, SEE ORDERS SIGNED. (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC
  12. Motion to Withdraw filed by Comment MOTION TO WITHDRAW FILED. Jeffrey Michael Godin (Attorney) on behalf of DANA COOPER (PETITIONER) Attorney: Jeffrey Michael Godin
  13. Hearing for Prove-UP Original Type Hearing for Prove-UP Judicial Officer Jones, Marlow Hearing Time 09:30 AM Result Order Entered Comment
  14. JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION Comment JUDGMENT FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PRESENTED, SIGNED AND ORDERED FILED (JONES) JMC
  15. IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES Comment CASE CALLED FOR HEARING ON ALL MATTERS. PETITIONER WITH ATTORNEY GODIN. RESPONDENT WITH ATTORNEY JONES-MAY. ATTORNEY GODIN'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW ALLOWED. WITNESS SWORN, EVIDENCE HEARD. COURT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES AND SUBJECT MATTER. COURT FINDS GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTION BASED UPON IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES. MARRIAGE DISSOLVED. AS TO ALL MATTERS, PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS TESTIFIED TO IN OPEN COURT AND CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT ORDER, MARITAL SETTLEM ENT AGREEMENT, AND ALLOCATION JUDGMENT. FOR ALL DETAILS, SEE ORDERS SIGNED.
 (JONES 104 AUDIO) JMC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more