Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-28
Type Dissolution Of Marriage
Docket 6 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Jonesdonald,
Defendant Joneskennesha,
Photo of Hon. BEARE, MINDY M.

Judge

Hon. BEARE, MINDY M.

Pittsburg County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WAIVER
  2. F&E MOTION FOR DISPOSITION
  3. F&E CERTIFICATE OF MAILING. GREEN CARD SIGNED ON 7/18/24.
  4. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: DISPOSITION/ORDER SETTING. RULING: PETITIONER CAUSED TO BE FILED A PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 28, 2023. RESPONDENT'S ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WAIVER WAS FILED ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 4, 2023. PETITIONER FILED A MOTION FOR DISPOSITION WHEREIN HE REQUESTED TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 1, 2024. THE COURT WAS UNAWARE THAT A REQUEST FOR DISPOSITION WAS MADE BY THE PETITIONER AS A COPY WAS NOT FORWARDED TO THE COURT DIRECTLY AND THERE WAS NO ORDER AND NOTICE SETTING SUBMITTED THAT WOULD HAVE PUT THE MOTION ON THE CURT'S MOTION DOCKET. NO OTHER PLEADINGS WERE FILED, AND THE MATTER WAS SET ON THE COURT'S AUGUST 12, 2024, DISPOSITION DOCKET. IT IS IN PREPARING FOR THAT DOCKET THE COURT FIRST HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE JANUARY 1, 2024, REQUEST. THEREFORE, THIS MATTER IS SET FOR TESTIMONY FOR PURPOSES OF A FINAL ORDER BEING ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, AT 10:00 A.M. THE PETITIONER MAY APPEAR VIRTUALLY; HOWEVER, THE COURT MUST RECEIVE THE PROPOSED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION PRIOR TO THE SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, HEARING DATE. THE PETITIONER WILL ALSO NEED TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH INFORMATION PERTAINING TO WHO TO CONTACT REGARDING SETTING UP THE VIRTUAL HEARING. S/BEARE (MAILED COPY OF CT. MIN. TO PETITIONER TODAY - G.M.)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.