Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION RESULT: BY THE PLAINTIFF
- COMPLAINT
- APPEARANCE Appearance
- APPEARANCE Appearance
- APPEARANCE Appearance
- RETURN OF SERVICE
- SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
- SCHEDULING ORDER
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD by D-03 RESULT: Granted 3/25/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/25/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- REQUEST TO REVISE
- OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Order 4/8/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- ORDER RESULT: Order 4/8/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD by D-03
- WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Withdraw of Motion for Extension of Time to Plead #108.00
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 4/22/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/22/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- REVISED COMPLAINT
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
- ANSWER DFT Dana Pinkerton's Answer to Revised Complaint
- REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Plaintiff Reply to Defendant D. Pinkerton Special Defense
- CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6 by D-03
- OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10
- ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE To Revised Complaint
- CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
- REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Plaintiff Reply to Defendant G. Touponse III and G. Touponse Jr. Special Defense
- CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
- NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 As to all defendants
- NOTICE nonstandard discovery to Pltf
- NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE Plf RFA
- ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a)
- NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
- OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 Plaintiff Objections to Defendant D. Pinkerton's First Set of Non-Standard IRP
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Nonstandard Interrogatories and Requests for Production
- DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Richard Hanel
- MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 12/4/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/4/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Def. G. Touponse III and G. Touponse, Jr. Motion for Extension of Time to Response to Discovery RESULT: Order 12/4/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- ORDER RESULT: Order 12/4/2024 KIMBERLY MASSICOTTE
- OBJECTION RE DISCOVERY OR DISCLOSURE
- NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
- OBJECTION RE DISCOVERY OR DISCLOSURE
- CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
- ORDER RESULT: Denied 12/12/2024 BY THE COURT
- CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
- WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In