Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-25
Status CLOSED - CLOSED
Type Ml Mandamus
Docket 73 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Delaware Charter Schools Network, Inc.|Delaware Charter Schools Network Inc.|Academia Antonia Alonso Inc.|Aspira Of Delaware Charter Operations, Inc.|East Side Charter School Of Wilmington Inc.|First State Montessori Academy Inc.|Gateway Charter School Inc.|Great Oaks Charter School Wilmington, Inc.|Kuumba Academy Charter School, Inc.|Mot Charter School, Inc.|Newark Charter School, Inc.|The Odyssey Charter School Inc.|Sussex Academy Inc.
Defendant Holodick, Mark A.|Holodick, Mark A
Photo of Hon. PRIMOS, NOEL EASON

Judge

Hon. PRIMOS, NOEL EASON

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SPLIT DECISION
  2. WRIT ISSUED
  3. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  4. PRAECIPE FILED
  5. WRIT ISSUED
  6. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  7. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED
  8. NOTICE
  9. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  10. ANSWER
  11. LETTER
  12. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  13. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  14. STIPULATION
  15. MOTION
  16. ORDER
  17. MOTION
  18. STIPULATION
  19. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  20. LETTER
  21. ORDER
  22. NOTICE
  23. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  24. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  25. NOTICE
  26. TRANSCRIPT FILED
  27. MEMORANDUM OPINION
  28. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 5, 2022 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER GOVERNING THE BRIEFING OF CROSS MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68350978
  29. MOTION
  30. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 11, 2022 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68362691
  31. ORDER
  32. ORDER SIGNED BY DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 11, 2022 ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE PRIMOS ON 11-09-2022 GRANTING THE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED SCHED. ORDER ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68371348
  33. MOTION
  34. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 24, 2022 DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS NOTICE OF MOTION PROPOSED ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68423416
  35. STIPULATION
  36. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 1, 2022 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTED COMPLAINT COMPARISON VERSION OF SUPPLEMENTED COMPLAINT TO THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68460589
  37. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  38. REPLY BRIEF FILED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 2, 2022 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68472611
  39. LETTER
  40. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 3, 2022 LETTER TO COUNSEL RE: ORAL ARGUMENT ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS WILL BE HELD LIVE ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2022 ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68498651
  41. ORDER
  42. COURT DISMISSAL DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 6, 2022 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT SIGNED BY JUDGE PRIMOS ON 12-2-22. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68506443
  43. NOTICE
  44. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 8, 2022 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF AUBREY J. MORIN AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68520537
  45. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  46. REPLY BRIEF FILED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 8, 2022 DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF HIS CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68530189
  47. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  48. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 9, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATION AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE COMPARISON REPORT OF ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68536406
  49. NOTICE
  50. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 22, 2022 ORDER SIGNED BY: FREUD, ANDREA MAYBEE ORAL ARGUMENT ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS HEARD BEFORE JUDGE PRIMOS-RESERVED DECISION WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW; APPEARED: JAMES TAYLOR, ESQ., WILLIAM MANNING, ESQ., JULIA CLIFTON, ESQ., LAURA MAKRASKY, DAG, CARLA JAROSZ, DAG; CTRM: 4; CM: AB; CR: C. KING (10:10-11:40; 11:56-12:13); CSO: G. JACKSON; LC: D. BROWN ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 68698796
  51. TRANSCRIPT FILED
  52. TRANSCRIPT FILED DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 1, 2023 DELAWARE CHARTER V HOLODICK ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 69042686
  53. MEMORANDUM OPINION
  54. MEMORANDUM OPINION FROM DATE DOCKETED: MARCH 25, 2023 ORDER SIGNED BY: PRIMOS, NOEL EASON MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGE NOEL EASON PRIMOS DATED MARCH 23, 2023 - UPON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS: UPON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - DENIED; AND UPON DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - GRANTED. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 69622826
  55. SPLIT DECISION
  56. SPLIT DECISION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED. BECAUSE THE COURT IS NOT DECIDING ON THE MERITS WHETHER THE BILLS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS ARE BILLS FOR TUITION CHARGES FOR SERVICES APPROPRIATELY FINANCED PURSUANT TO 14 DEL. C. 604, THE ACTION SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DATE DOCKETED: APRIL 11, 2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.