Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-20
Type Cc Other Administrative Review
Docket 39 entries
Disposition Tried by Court-Civil

Parties

Defendant Kummer, Mark|Roland, David Edward|Hunter, Jerry|Hetlage, James Carter|Barbaglia, Joseph|Hetlage, James Carter|Kraemer, Geraldine|Hetlage, James Carter|Winters, Derek|Hetlage, James Carter
Photo of Hon. Moriarty Joan L

Judge

Hon. Moriarty Joan L

St. Louis city (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Tried by Court-Civil
  3. Order JUDGMENT AND ORDER. This matter was called, heard, and submitted on August 1, 2022. The parties were given the full and fair opportunity to present evidence and agruments to the Court. The Court now rules as follows. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that judgment is entered in favor of Contestant John Coatar and against Contestee Mark Kummer. Contestee Mark Kummer does not meet the qualifiations for the office of President of the Board of Alderman. Stefan West and Andy Eihausen's Motion to Intervene is hereby DENIED. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). SO ORDERED: JUDGE JASON M. SENGHEISER
  4. Hearing Held Associated Entries: 07/29/2022 - Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 08/01/2022; 9:00 AM; JASON MARK SENGHEISER; Carnahan Courthouse
  5. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  6. Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/01/2022 - Hearing Held Scheduled For: 08/01/2022; 9:00 AM; JASON MARK SENGHEISER; Carnahan Courthouse
  7. Order The Court is hereby scheduling a hearing August 1, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. to allow the parties a chance to argue their motions related to whether Contestee will be on the ballot for the upcoming election for President of the Board of Alderman for the City of St. Louis. Unless the parties inform the Court by Friday afternoon at 5 p.m. that they would like an in-person hearing, the hearing on Monday will be conducted via webex. SO ORDERED: JUDGE JASON SENGHEISER
  8. Motion Filed Motion for Judgement on Pleadings; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR
  9. Filing of Briefs Reply Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR
  10. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  11. Motion to Intervene Motion to Intervene; Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene; Intervenors Petition for Declaratory Judgment; West Affidavit; Eihausen Affidavit; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: DAVID EDWARD ROLAND
  12. Filing of Briefs Kummer Response Brief; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: DAVID EDWARD ROLAND On Behalf Of: MARK KUMMER
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. Filing of Briefs Opening Brief; Exhibit 1; Exhibit 2; Exhibit 3; Exhibit 4; Exhibit 5; Exhibit 6; Exhibit 7; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR
  15. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  16. Answer Filed Kummer Answer and Affirmative Defenses; Kummer Affidavit; Bruce Affidavit; Constance Affidavit; Daft Affidavit; Betty Rodemyer Affidavit; Catherine Rodemyer Affidavit; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: DAVID EDWARD ROLAND On Behalf Of: MARK KUMMER
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Order The Parties appeared for a status conference on this case on July 25, 2022. At that conference, Contestant John Coatar ("Contestant") appeared by counsel, Contestee Mark Kummer ("Contestee") appeared by counsel, and the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of St. Louis appeared by counsel. All parties agreed to an expedited briefing and hearing schedule in this case so the Court can issue a judgment as soon as possible, no later than Monday, August 1, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). SO ORDERED: JUDGE JASON SENGHEISER
  19. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 07/22/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Hearing Continued From: 07/25/2022; 10:30 AM Motion Hearing
  20. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  21. Motion for Change of Judge Filed By: DAVID EDWARD ROLAND On Behalf Of: MARK KUMMER
  22. Entry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance - Roland; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: DAVID EDWARD ROLAND
  23. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  24. Motion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/25/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Scheduled For: 07/25/2022; 10:30 AM; JOAN L MORIARTY; Carnahan Courthouse
  25. Note to Clerk eFiling Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY
  26. Motion for Expedited Hearing Motion for Expedited Hearing. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR
  27. Motion to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendants Sued in Their Official Capacity as the Commissioners for the City of St. Louis; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES CARTER HETLAGE On Behalf Of: JERRY HUNTER, JOSEPH BARBAGLIA, GERALDINE KRAEMER, DEREK WINTERS
  28. Answer Filed Filed By: JAMES CARTER HETLAGE
  29. Entry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JAMES CARTER HETLAGE
  30. Notice of Service Affidavit of Service. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR
  31. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  32. Summons Personally Served Document ID - 22-SMCC-8911; Served To - KUMMER, MARK; Server - ; Served Date - 20-JUL-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Served
  33. Notice of Service Return of Service. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR
  34. Judge/Clerk - Note SUMMONS NOT ISSUED ON THE BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS DEFENDANTS DUE TO HOLD SERVICE NOTED ON PETITION
  35. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  36. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-8911, for KUMMER, MARK.
  37. Request Filed Motion for Special Process Server.
  38. Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY
  39. Pet Filed in Circuit Ct Petition; Exhibit 1; Exhibit 2; Exhibit 3; Exhibit 4; Exhibit 5. Filed By: SAMUEL KENNETH GLADNEY On Behalf Of: JOHN J COATAR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more