Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-24
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cavalry Spv I, Llc As Assignee Of Citibank N A C/o Levy & Associates Llc
Defendant Timothy W Henry
Photo of Hon. Kenneth R Callahan

Judge

Hon. Kenneth R Callahan

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PERSONAL IDENTIFIER FORM
  2. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID LEVY & ASSOCIATES, LLC
  3. JUDGMENT AMT: $1,803.61 RENDERED BY: CP CUYAHOGA ORIGINATING CASE NO.: CV22967783 JUDGMENT LIEN CASE#: JL23137204 CREDITOR: CAVALRY SPV I, LLC DEBTOR: TIMOTHY W HENRY INTEREST AT: 3% INTEREST FROM DATE: 11/30/2022 COSTS: 275.00 JUDGMENT DATE: 11/30/2022 DOCKET (JOURNAL): IMAGE PAGE: IMAGE TIME FILED: 01/26/2023 13:52:57 LIEN COST: 25 PAID BY: LEVY & ASSOCIATES, LLC SERIAL NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER:
  4. CASE REFUND TO LEVY & ASSOCIATES LLC.
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49195381) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TIMOTHY W HENRY 387 CLEVELAND RD CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49195380) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KATHLEEN SMITH [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49195379) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: YALE R. LEVY [email protected]
  8. UPON MOTION OF PLAINTIFF AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT, TIMOTHY W HENRY, IS GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT THE PLAINTIFF CAVALRY SPV 1, LLC AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A. RECOVER OF THE DEFENDANT, TIMOTHY W HENRY, A JUDGMENT IN THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THREE AND 61/100 DOLLARS ($1,803.61) PLUS INTEREST AT 3% PER ANNUM FROM THE JUDGMENT DATE, AND THE COURT COSTS OF (HIS ACTION, FOR ALL OF WHICH EXECUTION MAY BE ISSUED AS PROVIDED BY LAW. THE PARTIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THIS JUDGMENT. THE CLERK SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC ATTORNEY YALE R. LEVY 0065006 NOTICE OF HEARING
  10. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 11/28/2022 AT 01:30 PM. PLAINTIFF HAS FILED A MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND THE COURT HEREBY SETS A TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING. PARTIES ARE TO CALL THE COURT AT 216-443-8612. DEFENDANT IS CAUTIONED THAT FAILURE TO CALL WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THIS DATE AND TIME WILL BE CONSIDERED A FAILURE TO APPEAR AND THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE MOTION BASED ON THE FILINGS. PLAINTIFF IS CAUTIONED THAT FAILURE TO CALL WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THIS DATE AND TIME WILL BE CONSIDERED A FAILURE TO APPEAR AND MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL 1. NOTIFY DEFENDANT(S) BY MAIL OF HEARING DATE SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. 2. FILE WITH THE COURT EVIDENCE OF THIS NOTICE OF HEARING. 3. FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. 4. FILE A PROPOSED ENTRY. 5. FILE EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE SERVICE MEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT. IF PLAINTIFF HAS ALREADY FILED ANY OF THE FOREGOING, THERE IS NO NEED TO DUPLICATE THE FILING. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC ATTORNEY YALE R. LEVY 0065006 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  12. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12/12/2022 - UNKNOWN
  13. SUMS COMPLAINT(48659788) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TIMOTHY W HENRY 387 CLEVELAND RD CLEVELAND, OH 44108 ANSWER DATE: 10/21/2022
  14. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  15. WRIT FEE
  16. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE
  17. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48412023 RETURNED 9/13/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HENRY/TIMOTHY/W - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  18. SUMS COMPLAINT(48412023) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TIMOTHY W HENRY 387 CLEVELAND RD CLEVELAND, OH 44108
  19. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. JUDGE KENNETH R CALLAHAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  22. LEGAL RESEARCH
  23. LEGAL NEWS
  24. LEGAL AID
  25. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  26. COMPUTER FEE
  27. CLERK'S FEE
  28. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID YALE R. LEVY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more