Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-23
Status FINALSEAL - FINAL/RECORD SEALED
Type Dw Dept Workforce Service
Docket 95 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Helms, Amber Lee|Helms, James Michael
Defendant Uhrynowycz, Cynthia Lea
Photo of Hon. Stephanie Barrett Raymond Rue Abramson Philhours Randy Franklin

Judge

Hon. Stephanie Barrett Raymond Rue Abramson Philhours Randy Franklin

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DWS PET FOR REVW/BRD OF REVW
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  4. LETTER
  5. none.
  6. Letter
  7. CLERK NOTE
  8. The attorney would like a briefing schedule once the record has been filed.
  9. No Images
  10. ANSWER AND RECORD FILED
  11. none.
  12. No Images
  13. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  14. Appellant's brief is due July 4, 2022. Briefing notice sent to attorneys.
  15. Briefing Notice
  16. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  17. Appellant's brief is due July 11, 2022 after 7-day brief extension.
  18. No Images
  19. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  20. No paper copies required.
  21. No Images
  22. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  23. Appellee's brief is now due August 14, 2022.
  24. No Images
  25. LETTER FROM ATTORNEY
  26. Letter confirming the appellee's 7-day brief extension.
  27. No Images
  28. MOT TO SUPP THE RECORD
  29. Joint motion to supplement the record and for new briefing schedule.
  30. No Images
  31. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  32. Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  33. BRIEF
  34. MOTION SUBMITTED
  35. Joint motion to supplement the record and for new briefing schedule.
  36. No Images
  37. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  38. Joint motion to supplement the record and for new briefing schedule is granted. Electronic supplemental record is due in thirty days (September 23, 2022). Appellant's substituted brief is due thirty days after the electronic supplemental record is lodged. Appellee's brief is due thirty days thereafter.
  39. ORDER
  40. SUPPLEMENT RECORD ORDERED
  41. Supplemental record is due September 23, 2022.
  42. No Images
  43. SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD LODGED
  44. none.
  45. No Images
  46. REBRIEFING COMMENCED
  47. Appellant's brief is due October 23, 2022.
  48. No Images
  49. CLERK NOTE
  50. Rebriefing commenced docket entry entered on August 24, 2022, was entered in error and the appellant's brief is due, as required by the order, 30 days after the lodging of the record (today, 9/23/2022), which is October 23, 2022.
  51. No Images
  52. SUBSTITUTED BRIEF FILED
  53. No paper copies required.
  54. No Images
  55. SUBSTITUTED BRIEF FILED
  56. Substituted Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  57. No Images
  58. CASE SUBMITTED
  59. none.
  60. No Images
  61. MAJORITY OPINION
  62. Affirmed. Klappenbach and Murphy, JJ., agree.
  63. OPINION
  64. CLOSED/RECORD SEALED
  65. none.
  66. No Images
  67. CLERK NOTE
  68. Opinion mailed to Amber Lee Helms 3 Lou Ellen Drive LIttle Rock, AR. 72202.
  69. No Images
  70. OPINION PANEL
  71. none.
  72. No Images
  73. MANDATE TO CLERK
  74. none.
  75. Mandate

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more