Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Waterbury County

Court

Waterbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-15
Type C 30 Contracts Specific Performance
Docket 36 entries
Disposition judgment for plaintiff by stipulation before trial commenced

Parties

Plaintiff Robert A. Harris|Myrna E. Harris
Defendant Sunlight Construction, Inc.
Photo of Hon. W Pierson

Judge

Hon. W Pierson

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. EXECUTION ISSUED
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF DEFENSE PB 13-19
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 8/10/2023 BY THE CLERK
  7. ORDER RESULT: Denied 8/10/2023 BY THE CLERK
  8. MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE DEFENSE RESULT: Granted 11/1/2023 HON CHARLES REED
  9. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/1/2023 HON CHARLES REED
  10. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 10/18/2023 HON SUSAN COBB
  11. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/18/2023 HON SUSAN COBB
  12. ORDER TMC ORDER RESULT: Order 10/18/2023 HON SUSAN COBB
  13. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 12/6/2023 BY THE CLERK
  14. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/6/2023 BY THE CLERK
  15. PRESIDING JUDGE REFERRAL TO COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET
  16. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/8/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  17. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD
  18. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  19. ORDER General Case Management Order RESULT: Order 12/8/2023 HON W PIERSON
  20. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT RESULT: Granted 9/27/2024 HON W PIERSON
  21. ORDER Judgment enters on Count 2 - see order RESULT: Granted 9/27/2024 HON W PIERSON
  22. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT RESULT: Overruled 9/27/2024 HON W PIERSON
  23. ORDER RESULT: Overruled 9/27/2024 HON W PIERSON
  24. REPLY Reply to Objection to Motion for Judgment
  25. ORDER Notice- revised request for adjudication form RESULT: Order 8/29/2024 HON W PIERSON
  26. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  27. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
  28. OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
  29. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION RESULT: Granted 1/7/2025 HON W PIERSON
  30. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/7/2025 HON W PIERSON
  31. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  32. JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF BY STIPULATION BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCED RESULT: HON W PIERSON
  33. APPLICATION FOR EXECUTION FINANCIAL INSTITUTION - NOT NATURAL PERSON/INDIVIDUAL (JD-CV-24N)
  34. EXECUTION ISSUED
  35. EXECUTION RETURNED UNSATISFIED Financial Execution_Unsatisfied
  36. APPLICATION FOR EXECUTION-PROPERTY APPLICATION, ORDER, EXECUTION (JD-CV-5)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more