Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-25
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 87 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.
Defendant Vito J. Florio Jr|Jane Doe Name Unk. Unk. Spouse Of Vito J. Florio Jr. (if Any)|United States Of America, Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development
Photo of Hon. BRIAN J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. BRIAN J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359758) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359757) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359756) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ELIZABETH DEUCHER [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359755) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359754) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359753) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49359752) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN G. TUMA [email protected]
  9. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. FINAL. . . COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 01/31/2023 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED. PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS ON 12/5/22. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/31/2023 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  12. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2) 12/20/2022 - GRANTED
  13. NOTICE FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF HEARING
  14. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 01/31/2023 AT 01:30 PM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. CMC HELD. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL APPEARED. DEFENDANT VITO J. FLORIO JR.'S COUNSEL APPEARED. NO OTHER PARTIES APPEARED. BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED 10/27/22, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 1/10/23. REPLIES, IF ANY, MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 1/24/23. THEREAFTER, THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 11/10/2022 AT 08:45 AM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. NOTICE FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY RICHARD J. SYKORA 0093134 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  18. NOTICE FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY RICHARD J. SYKORA 0093134 NOTICE OF FILING ENTRY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  19. NOTICE FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY RICHARD J. SYKORA 0093134 NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  20. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12/20/2022 - MOOT
  21. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT WITH AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED 12/20/2022 - MOOT
  22. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY ANN M JOHNSON 0072981 AFFIDAVIT REGARDING MILITARY STATUS
  23. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 10/26/2022 AT 10:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  24. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48443521 RETURNED 09/01/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. ANSWER FILED BY D3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ATTORNEY ELIZABETH DEUCHER 0095442 ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48443523 RETURNED 09/01/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FLORIO JR/VITO/J. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY RICHARD J. SYKORA 0093134 CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  28. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 10/26/2022 AT 10:00 AM BY TELEPHONE. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  29. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48443524 RETURNED 9/20/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FLORIO JR/VITO/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48443522 RETURNED 9/20/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48422231 RETURNED 9/20/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT FLORIO JR/VITO/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  32. ANSWER FILED BY D1 VITO J. FLORIO ATTORNEY BRIAN G. TUMA 0055884 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT VITO J. FLORIO, JR.
  33. USPS RECEIPT NO. 48443519 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/07/2022 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESSED BY COC 09/14/2022.
  34. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY RICHARD J. SYKORA 0093134 AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD J SYKORA
  35. 48443319 ON 08/29/2022 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED FLORIO JR/VITO/J. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  36. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48443520 RETURNED BY U.S. MAIL DEPARTMENT 08/31/2022 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MAIL RECEIVED AT ADDRESS 09/07/2022 TENDERED TO AGENT FOR FINAL DELIVERY
  37. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48422233 RETURNED BY U.S. MAIL DEPARTMENT 08/30/2022 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MAIL RECEIVED AT ADDRESS 09/07/2022 TENDERED TO AGENT FOR FINAL DELIVERY
  38. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  39. MAGISTRATE GINA LUNSFORD ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  40. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  41. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED NOTICE OF SUMMON SERVICE RETURN
  42. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED NOTICE OF SUMMON SERVICE RETURN
  43. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443524) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: VITO J. FLORIO JR 10970 GROSS DRIVE PARMA, OH 44130
  44. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443523) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: VITO J. FLORIO JR 2454 AKINS ROAD BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, OH 44147-0000
  45. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443522) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) 10970 GROSS DRIVE PARMA, OH 44130
  46. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443521) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) 2454 AKINS ROAD BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, OH 44147-0000
  47. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443520) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT C/O THE U.S. ATTY FOR THE N. DIST. 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  48. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443519) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT C/O THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, DC 20530-0000
  49. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48422232 RETURNED 8/29/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  50. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  51. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  52. WRIT FEE
  53. WRIT FEE
  54. WRIT FEE
  55. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  56. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  57. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  58. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  59. WRIT FEE
  60. WRIT FEE
  61. WRIT FEE
  62. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443319) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: VITO J. FLORIO JR 10970 GROSS DRIVE PARMA, OH 44130
  63. SUMS COMPLAINT(48443318) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) 10970 GROSS DRIVE PARMA, OH 44130
  64. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  65. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. WRIT FEE
  67. WRIT FEE
  68. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  69. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  70. SUMS COMPLAINT(48422233) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT C/O THE U.S. ATTY FOR THE N. DIST. 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  71. SUMS COMPLAINT(48422232) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE NAME UNK. UNK. SPOUSE OF VITO J. FLORIO JR. (IF ANY) 10970 GROSS DRIVE PARMA, OH 44130
  72. SUMS COMPLAINT(48422231) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: VITO J. FLORIO JR 10970 GROSS DRIVE PARMA, OH 44130
  73. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  74. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  75. WRIT FEE
  76. WRIT FEE
  77. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  78. WRIT FEE
  79. JUDGE BRIAN J CORRIGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  80. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  81. LEGAL RESEARCH
  82. LEGAL NEWS
  83. LEGAL AID
  84. COMPUTER FEE
  85. CLERK'S FEE
  86. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RICHARD J. SYKORA
  87. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RICHARD J. SYKORA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more