Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Notice of Service SERVICE RETURN; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 22-CP22-7; Served To - STARK, ALITIA L; Server - SO RIPLEY COUNTY-DONIPHAN; Served Date - 12-JAN-23; Served Time - 14:49:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Judge/Clerk - Note Copy of Full Order of Protection mailed to Petitioner.
- Protection Order Issued
- Judmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 06-JUN-2023; Resp not to enter or stay - YES
- Full Order of Protection
- Tried by Court-Civil Petitioner appears in person. Respondent fails to appear. Guardian Ad Litem, Siegrid Maness, appears in person. Hearing conducted. Evidence presented. By preponderance of the evidence, the court finds as follows. The children are residents of Ripley County, Missouri. The petitioner is a parent or guardian of the children. The respondent is not a present or former adult household member of the children. The children have been abused by respondent. The respondent subjected the child to emotional abuse on 11/26/2022. The respondent stalked the children by purposely and repeatedly harassing or following the children with the intent of harassing the children. A full order of protection is ordered for a period of 180 days to protect the children as follows. 1) Respondent is restrained from abusing, threatening to abuse, molesting, stalking or disturbing the peace of the children. 2) Respondent is restrained from entering the family home of the children. 3) Respondent is restrained from having any contact with the children. Judgment for the fees of the guardian ad litem in the amount of $150.00 is ordered entered against petitioner and in favor of the said guardian ad litem. So ordered. TDS/kb
- Child Protection Hearing Held Associated Entries: 11/29/2022 - Child Prot Hrng Scheduled Scheduled For: 12/08/2022; 9:01 AM; THOMAS D SWINDLE; Ripley
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Notice of Service SERVICE RETURN.
- Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 22-CP12-17; Served To - STARK, ALITIA L; Server - SO RIPLEY COUNTY-DONIPHAN; Served Date - 29-NOV-22; Served Time - 14:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
- Ex Parte Order Issued Document ID: 22-CP12-17, for STARK, ALITIA L.
- Child Prot Hrng Scheduled Associated Entries: 12/08/2022 - Child Protection Hearing Held Scheduled For: 12/08/2022; 9:01 AM; THOMAS D SWINDLE; Ripley
- Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
- Pet for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - NEIGHBOR Filed By: Petitioner
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
