Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-05
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Paradigm Assets Recovery Llc
Defendant Vito Sosic
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53539298) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: VITO SOSIC 1255 WINSTON ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53539297) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KATIE CARBONE [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53539296) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ASHLEY NONIS-HARTMAN [email protected]
  5. PURSUANT TO JOURNAL ENTRY 4-4-24 AND CIVIL RULE 4 THIS CASE IS DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/17/2024 AT 09:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  7. TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/27/2025 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  8. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 12/17/2024 AT 09:30 AM. (Notice Sent).
  9. TRIAL SET FOR 01/27/2025 AT 09:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  10. PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO APPEAR FOR ITS MOTION FOR DEFAULT SET FOR 03-06-24 AND FOR ITS CMC SET FOR 04-03-24 @ 11:00 A.M. CMC IN PERSON SET FOR 04-10-24 @ 3:00 P.M. SHOULD PLAINTIFF FAIL TO APPEAR THIS CASE WILL DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/10/2024 AT 03:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  12. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 02/02/2024, IS DENIED. DEFENDANT APPEARED AT MOTION FOR DEFAULT HEARING AND PLAINTIFF FAILED TO APPEAR. CMC SET FOR 04-03-24 @ 11:00 A.M. IN PERSON IN COURTROOM 23-B. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/03/2024 AT 11:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  14. D1 VITO SOSIC MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 4/6/2024, FILED PRO SE 9999999 04/10/2024 - MOOT
  15. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 02/06/2024 AT 02:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  16. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 03/06/2024 AT 09:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  17. DEFAULT HEARING IS SET FOR 03-06-24 @ 9:00 A.M. PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE COURT WITH PROOF OF SERVICE, AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY, AND A COPY OF LETTER SENT TO DEFENDANT BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED (RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED) U.S. MAIL. PLAINTIFF'S LETTER TO DEFENDANT SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING. SAID LETTER SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED AGAINST YOU." IF PLAINTIFF'S CASE IS A COLLECTION ON AN ACCOUNT(S) PLAINTIFF SHALL ALSO PROVIDE COPIES OF AN ACTUAL BILLING STATEMENT TO DEFENDANT, DOCUMENTATION OF THE DATE OF THE LAST PURCHASE ON THE ACCOUNT MADE BY DEFENDANT, NOT TO INCLUDE A LATE PAYMENT FEE OR INTEREST FEE ONLY, DOCUMENTATION OF THE DATE OF THE LAST PAYMENT ON THE ACCOUNT, AND DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF ASSIGNMENT OF THE ACCOUNT NOT BY AFFIDAVIT. DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTATION BY FILING THE SAME WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 03/07/2024 - DENIED
  19. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR SOSIC /VITO/ 12/30/2023 17:00:58
  20. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR NONIS-HARTMAN/ASHLEY/ 12/30/2023 17:00:58
  21. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 02/06/2024 AT 02:00 PM. CMC SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY PHONE, COURT TO INITIATE THE CALL. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE PARTICIPATE BY PHONE AND ARE REQUIRED TO FILE THEIR TELEPHONE NUMBER, ADDRESS AND EMAIL ADDRESS WITH THIS COURT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE CMC. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULES OF PROCEDURE. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT.
  22. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52541303 DELIVERED BY USPS 12/16/2023 SOSIC /VITO/ PROCESSED BY COC 12/27/2023.
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(52541303) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: VITO SOSIC 1255 WINSTON ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  24. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  25. WRIT FEE
  26. JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  27. LEGAL RESEARCH
  28. LEGAL NEWS
  29. LEGAL AID
  30. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  31. COMPUTER FEE
  32. CLERK'S FEE
  33. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ASHLEY NONIS-HARTMAN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more