Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-31
Status FINAL - FINAL
Type Ia Interlocutory Appeal
Docket 140 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Crawford Operations, Llc|Crawford Progressive Eldercare Services, Inc.|Blassingame, Samantha|Dossett, Mark Winfield|Fletcher, Jeffrey Michael|Sugg, Caleb Scott
Defendant Grayson, Keith L|Cook, Craig Lewis|Davis, Crystal
Photo of Hon. Cottrell Gary Ray Rhonda K Wood

Judge

Hon. Cottrell Gary Ray Rhonda K Wood

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate court coversheet.
  3. No Images
  4. RECORD LODGED $
  5. E-filed record. Pleadings: 2 volumes; 1,636 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 54 pages. No physical exhibits. Record lodged per the O'Fallon Rule concerning corrections of errors in form (record tendered January 31, 2022).
  6. No Images
  7. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  8. none.
  9. No Images
  10. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  11. Appellants' brief due March 12, 2022. Briefing notice sent to Samantha Blassingame, Zach Musgraves, Craig Cook, and Keith Grayson.
  12. BRIEFING NOTICE
  13. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  14. A Payment of $165.00 was made on receipt ARCA4333.
  15. No Images
  16. RECUSAL
  17. none.
  18. No Images
  19. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  20. Appellants' brief is due March 19, 2022 after7-day brief extension.
  21. LETTER
  22. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  23. Appellants' motion for extension of time to file brief.
  24. MOTION
  25. BRIEF EXTENSION
  26. Appellants' brief is due April 11, 2022.
  27. ORDER
  28. EFILING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  29. none.
  30. No Images
  31. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  32. Appellants' motion for extension of time to file brief.
  33. MOTION
  34. BRIEF EXTENSION
  35. Appellants' brief is due April 25, 2022.
  36. ORDER
  37. EFILING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  38. none.
  39. No Images
  40. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  41. No paper copies required.
  42. BRIEF
  43. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  44. Appellee's brief is due June 1, 2022 after 7-day brief extension.
  45. LETTER
  46. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  47. Motion for extension of time to file appellee's brief.
  48. MOTION
  49. BRIEF EXTENSION
  50. Appellee's brief is due June 29, 2022.
  51. ORDER
  52. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  53. Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  54. BRIEF
  55. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  56. Motion for extension of time to file appellants' reply brief.
  57. MOTION
  58. BRIEF EXTENSION
  59. Appellants' reply brief is due July 27, 2022.
  60. ORDER
  61. REPLY BRIEF
  62. No paper copies required.
  63. BRIEF
  64. CASE SUBMITTED
  65. none.
  66. No Images
  67. MAJORITY OPINION
  68. Affirmed. Abramson and Gruber, JJ., agree.
  69. OPINION
  70. OPINION PANEL
  71. none.
  72. No Images
  73. PETITION FOR REHEARING $
  74. Appellants' petition for rehearing.
  75. PETITION
  76. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  77. A Payment of $25.00 was made on receipt ARCA5000.
  78. No Images
  79. PET FOR REHEARING SUBMITTED
  80. Appellants' petition for rehearing.
  81. No Images
  82. LETTER ORDERS - COA
  83. Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied. Harrison, C.J., not participating.
  84. ORDER
  85. PETITION FOR REVIEW $
  86. Appellants' petition for review.
  87. PETITION
  88. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  89. A Payment of $25.00 was made on receipt ARCA5117.
  90. No Images
  91. RESPONSE TO PET FOR REVIEW
  92. Appellee's response to petition for review.
  93. RESPONSE
  94. PETITION FOR REVIEW SUBMITTED
  95. none.
  96. No Images
  97. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
  98. none.
  99. No Images
  100. LETTER ORDERS - SC
  101. Appellant's petition for review is denied.
  102. ORDER
  103. MANDATE TO CLERK
  104. none.
  105. Mandate

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.