Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-11
Type Divorce
Docket 95 entries
Disposition Decree
Photo of Hon. Thomas Linda S

Judge

Hon. Thomas Linda S

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AND ENTER PETITION(JAD)
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND (WITH ATTORNEY)
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION,
  14. ISSUED (RET'D TO ATTY )
  15. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER(JAD)
  16. ORIG SUMMONS RET'D SERVED (STEPHANIE JEAN BATES
  17. 2-14-22) (KC)
  18. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE (KC)
  19. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (KC)
  20. RESPONSE TO PETITION AND COUNTER-CLAIM FOR DISSOLUTION
  21. OF MARRIAGE (KC)
  22. RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
  23. ORDERS AND COUNTER-APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS
  24. (KC)
  25. ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR
  26. TEMPORARY ORDER (3-25-22 @ 9:00 AM) (KC)
  27. CM:VACLAW. PLTF APPEARS TODAY IN PO-22-47. CRT
  28. CONSOLIDATES THAT MATTER W/THIS CASE AND SETS MATTER
  29. FOR 3/25/22 @ 9:00AM W/JUDGE FRANKS. (KM)
  30. AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR
  31. TEMPORARY ORDERS AND COUNTER-APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
  32. ORDERS (GP)
  33. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC
  34. TEMPORARY INJUNCTION (GP)
  35. CM:FRANKS BY BAILIFF HARPER- HEARING SET FOR 3.25.22 @
  36. 9:00AM IS PASSED BY AGREEMENT TO 4.1.22 @ 9:00AM. TERMS
  37. OF TRAILING PO-22-47 REMAIN IN FULL FORCE & EFFECT.
  38. (WG)
  39. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE & EXTENSTION OF EX-PARTE
  40. PROTECTIVE ORDER (4.1.22 @ 9:00AM) (WG)
  41. CM:FRANKS BY BAILIFF HARPER-PER AGREEMENT OF BOTH
  42. SIDES; MATTER SET FOR 4.1.22 @ 9:00AM IS CONTINUED TO
  43. 5.13.22 @ 9:00AM. PO-22-47 IS TRAILING SAID MATTER &
  44. SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE & EFFECT. (WG)
  45. COURT MINUTE FILED (WG)
  46. ORDER SETTING HEARING FOR APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM
  47. THE AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION (SM)
  48. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (D STANTON FOR PETIT) (SM)
  49. MOTION TO STRIKE TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING AND ENFORCE
  50. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (SM)
  51. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (J BILLS FOR RESP)(SM)
  52. REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT W/CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
  53. ATTACHED (ORIG)(SM)
  54. ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT (LINDA THOMAS) (6/2/22 @ 1:30PM)
  55. (SM) (ORIG )
  56. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S
  57. PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (SM)
  58. ORDER SETTING EXPEDITED HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S
  59. PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (5/18/22 @ 2:00PM)(SM)
  60. CM:THOMAS-PETIT BY ATTY K JONES-DEFT W/ATTY D
  61. KEESLING AND D STANTON. MATTER COMES ON FOR HEARING
  62. ON EPO. DEFT OBJECTS CONTINUANCE OF EPO HEARING AND
  63. TO MOTION TO CONTINUE OUT OF TIME IN FD-22-16 &
  64. PO-22-47. DEFT FEELS THIS IS A PLOY TO PROLONG CASE.
  65. ARGUMENTS HEARD BY EACH PARTY. PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO
  66. A MUTUAL NO CONTACT ORDER TO BE FILED IN FD-22-16 AND
  67. DISMISSING PO. ORDER TO BE DRAWN UP AND PRESENTED TO
  68. COURT FOR APPROVAL. (SM)
  69. MOTION TO FILE RESPONSE OUT OF TIME (ORIG) (SM)
  70. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  71. (K JONES FOR S BATES)(ORIG) (SM)
  72. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (ORIG) (SM)
  73. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
  74. AGREEMENT (SM)
  75. ORDER (ORIG)(SM)
  76. PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF TO RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO
  77. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING
  78. AND ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (GP)
  79. CM:THOMAS PER BAILIFF ROBISON. ATTY K JONES FOR PETIT
  80. CONTACTED CRT. PARTIES AGREE TO STRIKE 6/2/22 HEARING.
  81. A SCHEDULING ORDER IS TO BE SUBMITTED. MATTER IS RESET
  82. UPON APPLICATION. (SM)
  83. AGREED JOURNAL ENTRY ON STATUS (SM)
  84. ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ENFORCE
  85. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (8/3/22 @ 2:00PM)(SM)
  86. ORDER CONTINUING HEARING (10-13-22 @2:30 PM) (KC)
  87. CM:THOMAS PER BAILIFF ROBISON. PARTIES CONTACTED COURT.
  88. MATTER SET FOR 10/13/22 @ 2:30PM IS STRICKEN. ORDER IS
  89. TO BE SUBMITTED TO COURT. (SM)
  90. NOTICE OF CHANGE IN LAW FIRM AFFILIATION (SM)
  91. AGREED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE (SM)
  92. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL (SM)
  93. ORDER ALLOWING ATTORNEY OF RECORD TO WITHDRAW (K JONES
  94. FOR RESP)(SM)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more