Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-24
Status Dismissed
Type 06 Unlimited Breach Of Contract/warranty
Docket 44 entries
Disposition settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Wilson, Wayne Harold|View Document 2/26/24 Notice Of Posting Jury Fees
Defendant Ford Motor Company|Lithia Ford Lincoln Of Fresno
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Jury Trial Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Settled Comment Estimated 7 days
  2. Summons issued and filed View Document 10-30-23 Summons
  3. Notice Filed View Document 10-30-23 Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes Comment Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purpose (emailed)
  4. Civil case cover sheet View Document 11-1-23 Civil Case Cover Sheet
  5. Proof of Service View Document 11-27-23 Proof of Service
  6. Proof of Service View Document 11-27-23 Proof of Service
  7. Summons and Complaint Unserved Comment Defective re: Line 3b name and relationship of registered agent for service not provided.
  8. Summons and Complaint Unserved Comment Defective re: Line 3b and 5a incomplete
  9. Answer Filed View Document Answer
  10. Answer Filed View Document Lithia's Answer
  11. Case Management Statement Filed View Document Case Management Statement
  12. Case Management Statement Filed View Document -Case Management Statement
  13. Notice Filed View Document Plaintiff Notice of Posting Jury Fees Comment Notice of Jury Deposit
  14. Case Management Conference Original Type Case Management Conference Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Hearing Time 3:00 PM Result Heard
  15. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment
  16. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall Comment K. Preston appearing on behalf of C. Urner
  17. Jury Trial Requested by Both Parties Comment Estimated 7 days
  18. Referral to ADR
  19. Notice of Motion View Document 3.19.24 Notice of Motion And Motion To Compel (Form Interr.)- HRG- 5.1.24 Comment HRG-5.1.24--Plaintiff's Notice of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant Lithia Ford Lincoln of Fresno's Response To Form Interrogatories, Set One; Memorandum of Points of Authorities; Declaration of Adina A. Ostoia; Exhibits; (Propose) Order
  20. Order Received for Signature View Document 3.19.24 Proposed Order (Form Interr.)- HRG 5.1.24 Comment PENDING REVIEW UNTIL HEARING- 5.1.24 Order for: Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Defendant Lithia Ford Lincoln Of Fresno To Respond To Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories, Set One
  21. Notice of Motion View Document 3.19.24 Notice of Motion And Motion To Compel (Special Interr.)- HRG- 5.1.24 Comment HRG-5.1.24--Plaintiff's Notice of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant Lithia Ford Lincoln of Fresno's Response To Special Interrogatories, Set One; Memorandum of Points of Authorities; Declaration of Adina A. Ostoia; Exhibits; (Propose) Order
  22. Order Received for Signature View Document 3.19.24 Proposed Order (Special Interr.)- HRG 5.1.24 Comment PENDING REVIEW UNTIL HEARING- 5.1.24 Order for: Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Defendant Lithia Ford Lincoln Of Fresno To Respond To Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One
  23. Notice of Motion View Document 3.19.24 Notice of Motion And Motion For Order Deeming Requests for Admissions Admitted- HRG- 5.1.24 Comment HRG- 5.1.24- Plaintiff's Notice of Motion And Motion For Order Deeming Requests For Admissions Admitted; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Sanction; Declaration of Adina A. Ostoia; Exhibits; (Proposed) Order
  24. Order Received for Signature View Document 3.19.24 Proposed Order (Admissions Admitted)- HRG 5.1.24 Comment PENDING REVIEW UNTIL HEARING- 5.1.24 Order for: Plaintiff's Motion For Order Establishing Admissions Admitted And Awarding Plaintiffs Monetary Sanctions In The Amount of $2,151.75
  25. Notice Filed View Document - Notice of Withdrawal Comment of Withdrawal of Motion Compel - Form Interr
  26. Notice Filed View Document - Notice of Withdrawal Comment of Withdrawal of Motion Compel - Admissions Admitted
  27. Notice Filed View Document - Notice of Withdrawal Comment of Withdrawal of Motion Compel - Spec Interr
  28. Motion - Compel Initial Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler Hearing Time 3:27 PM Cancel Reason Off Calendar Comment Filed 3.19.24- Form Interr - Adina Oftoya
  29. Motion - Compel Initial Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler Hearing Time 3:27 PM Cancel Reason Off Calendar Comment Filed 3.19.24- Spec Interr - Adina Oftoya
  30. Motion - Admissions Deemed Admitted Judicial Officer Tharpe, D Tyler Hearing Time 3:27 PM Cancel Reason Off Calendar Comment Filed 3.19.24 -Adina Oftoya
  31. ADR Stipulation - Not All Signed View Document ADR Stipulation Comment Not signed by: Defendant Party(s) who signed: Ron Akasaka ADR method chosen:
  32. Notice Filed View Document Notice of Remote Appearance Comment Notice of Remote Appearance
  33. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted View Document Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Comment Party: Wilson, Wayne Harold Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  34. OSC - ADR Stipulation Original Type OSC - ADR Stipulation Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Hearing Time 3:02 PM Result Heard
  35. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment
  36. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall Comment Appearance by K. Preston for Defendant
  37. Notice Filed View Document 04186858.pdf Comment Notice of Continued OSC re: ADR
  38. Conditional Settlement Reached View Document Notice of Settlement Comment Projected Completion Date:
  39. Notice of Hearing View Document Notice of Hearing Comment CRC 3.1385 Hearing set for at 3:00pm in Dept. 97E
  40. OSC - ADR Stipulation Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G Hearing Time 3:02 PM Cancel Reason Settled
  41. Request for Dismissal Received - Pending Review View Document Request for Dismissal Comment Request for Dismissal
  42. CRC 3.1385 After Settlement Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G Hearing Time 3:01 PM Cancel Reason Dismissed
  43. Mandatory Settlement Conference Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason Settled
  44. Trial Readiness Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 9:30 AM Cancel Reason Settled

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more