Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-30
Type Protective Order
Docket 51 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. Larson Christine M

Judge

Hon. Larson Christine M

Cimarron County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  2. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 7-'04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. EMERGENCY EX PARTE ISSUED TO TCSO
  16. ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE
  17. ORDER
  18. EPO W/RETURN OF SERVICE BY SHERIFF
  19. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICES (D.LAMB)
  20. CM: MINUTE/ORDER
  21. PETITIONER DID NOT FILE POLICE REPORT WITH THE COURT.
  22. PETITIONER REQUESTED TIME TO PRESENT A POLICE REPORT TO
  23. THE COURT. DEFT OBJECTED TO CONTINUANCE BECAUSE HE
  24. NOW RESIDES IN TEXAS. COURT CONT'D HRG OF EPO TO MARCH
  25. 30, 2023 AT 2:30PM.
  26. CONTINUED EMERGENCY ORDER OF PROTECTION
  27. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  28. CM: MINUTE/ORDER
  29. DEFT'S ATTY REQUESTED HRG BE CONTINUED DUE TO
  30. SCHEDULING CONFLICT. COURT CONTINUED EPO AND FINAL
  31. HEARING TO APRIL 25, 2023 AT 9AM.
  32. CONTINUED EPO
  33. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  34. CM: MINUTE/ORDER
  35. BOTH PARTIES APPEARED. PETITIONER PRESENTED TO THE
  36. COURT HER COMPLIANT TO THE HOOKER PD. COURT GRANTS
  37. FINAL P.O. EFF. UNTIL APRIL 25, 2024. NO COSTS ASSESSED
  38. FINAL ORDER OF PROTECTION
  39. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  40. DISMISSING COSTS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase