Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-18
Type Cc Pers Injury Prod Liab
Docket 34 entries
Disposition Change of Venue

Parties

Defendant Monsanto Company|Hansell, Erik Lansdowne|Savinelli, Dominique|Henslerdickenson, Catherine|Larkin, Timothy Patrick|Miller, Christine F|Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc.|Jansen, Scott Timothy|Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.|Jansen, Scott Timothy|Ott, David Gerard
Photo of Hon. Mullen Michael Kellan

Judge

Hon. Mullen Michael Kellan

St. Louis city (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Judge/Clerk - Note CASE TAXED CHANGE OF VENUE
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. Change of Venue
  5. Order THEREFORE, it is Ordered and Decreed that Defendant Monsanto Company's Motion to Transfer Venue is hereby GRANTED. It is further Ordered that Defendant's Osborn & Barr Communication, Inc's and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc's Motion to Transfer Venue is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are hereby transferred to Saint Louis County. SO ORDERED: JUDGE MICHAEL MULLEN
  6. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  7. Motion to Transfer OB Defs Supplemental Motion to Transfer Venue - Exhibit A; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT TIMOTHY JANSEN On Behalf Of: OSBORN & BARR COMMUNICATIONS, INC., OSBORN & BARR HOLDINGS, INC.
  8. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  9. Reply Monsantos Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Monsantos Motion to Transfer Venue; Exhibit A; Exhibit B; Exhibit C; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ERIK LANSDOWNE HANSELL On Behalf Of: MONSANTO COMPANY
  10. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  11. Entry of Appearance Filed ENTRY OF APPEARANCE on behalf of Defendant Monsanto Company.; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: CHRISTINE F MILLER On Behalf Of: MONSANTO COMPANY
  12. Entry of Appearance Filed ENTRY OF APPEARANCE on behalf of Defendant Monsanto Company.; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ERIK LANSDOWNE HANSELL On Behalf Of: MONSANTO COMPANY
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. Notice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY On Behalf Of: RACHAEL DIPIAZZA
  15. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  16. Response Filed Plaintiffs Response to Defendant Monsantos Motion to Transfer Venue; Exhibit A; Exhibit B; Exhibit C; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY On Behalf Of: RACHAEL DIPIAZZA
  17. Reply Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendants Osborn Barr Holdings and Osborn Barr Communications Motion to Transfer Venue; Exhibit A; Exhibit B; Exhibit C; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY On Behalf Of: RACHAEL DIPIAZZA
  18. Response Filed Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendants Osborn Barr Holdings and Osborn Barr Communications Motion to Dismiss; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY On Behalf Of: RACHAEL DIPIAZZA
  19. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  20. Suggestions in Support Osborn Barr Defendants Suggestions in Support of their Motion to Dismiss or for More Definite Statement; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT TIMOTHY JANSEN On Behalf Of: OSBORN & BARR COMMUNICATIONS, INC., OSBORN & BARR HOLDINGS, INC.
  21. Motion to Dismiss Osborn Barr Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or, in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT TIMOTHY JANSEN
  22. Motion to Transfer Filed By: SCOTT TIMOTHY JANSEN
  23. Entry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT TIMOTHY JANSEN
  24. Motion for Change of Venue Monsanto Companys Motion to Transfer Venue; Monsanto Companys Exhibits A and B to Motion to Transfer Venue; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ANTHONY REY MARTINEZ On Behalf Of: MONSANTO COMPANY
  25. Answer Filed Monsanto Companys Answer to Plaintiffs Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ANTHONY REY MARTINEZ
  26. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  27. Memorandum Filed Memorandum of Payment. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY On Behalf Of: RACHAEL DIPIAZZA
  28. Judge/Clerk - Note PLEASE E-FILE A FILING MEMORANDUM WITH THE REMAINING FILING FEE OF 40.00 DOLLARS FOR THIS MATTER
  29. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-8431, for OSBORN & BARR HOLDINGS INC.
  30. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-8430, for OSBORN & BARR COMMUNICATIONS INC.
  31. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-8429, for MONSANTO COMPANY.
  32. Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY
  33. Request Filed Request for Special Process Server. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY On Behalf Of: RACHAEL DIPIAZZA
  34. Pet Filed in Circuit Ct Petition. Filed By: RANDALL DAVID GRADY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more