Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-26
Status Open
Type Permit Session
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bolton Street Partners, Llc|Walden Street Partners, Llc
Defendant City Of Cambridge, By And Through Its Inspectional Services Department

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Assigned to the Average Track of the Permit Session.
  2. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 442825 Date: 07/27/2023
  3. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 442825 Date: 07/27/2023
  4. Petition Pursuant to G.L.c. 240 sec. 14A, eFiled in the Permit Session.
  5. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  6. Event Scheduled Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Event: Case Management Conference VIA ZOOM Date: 08/18/2023 Time: 09:30 AM Email notice to: Attorney Michael W. Ford; Attorney Peter B. Morin; and Attorney Ryan M. Gazda.
  7. STRICKEN BY THE COURT ON AUGUST 14, 2023. (Plaintiffs') Joint Case Management Conference Statement, filed.
  8. The "joint" case management conference statement only has the plaintiffs' contributions. Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed August 11, 2023 is STRICKEN. Plaintiffs' counsel need to submit a "joint" case management conference statement. Email notice to: Attorney Michael W. Ford; Attorney Peter B. Morin; and Attorney Ryan M. Gazda. Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Peter B Morin, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Michael William Ford, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Ryan M Gazda, Esq. [email protected]
  9. Appearance of Franziskus Lepionka, Esq., Megan B Bayer, Esq. for Inspectional Services Department, City Of Cambridge, filed
  10. Summons returned to Court with service on Inspectional Services Department, City Of Cambridge filed. 08/10/2023: Service in hand to Prazres McDonald, agent, person in charge at the time of service
  11. Joint Case Management Statement, filed by email.
  12. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 08/18/2023 09:30 AM Has been: Held via video. Attorney Michael W. Ford appeared for plaintiffs and Attorney Franziskus Lepionka appeared for defendant. Early Intervention Event held. In response to the court's inquiry, the parties agreed that mediation is not practical for this case as it solely involves issues of law. The court, with Attorney Ford's assent, extended the time for Attorney Lepionka to file an answer to September 15, 2023. The court set a deadline for Attorney Ford to file and serve a motion for summary judgment for October 1, 2023, the briefing thereafter to be governed by Land Court Rule 4. The court further scheduled a hearing on the summary judgment motion(s) for March 26, 2024 at 2:00 p.m., to be held via videoconference. The court will contact the parties if an earlier hearing date becomes available in the interim. Email notice to: Attorney Michael W. Ford and Attorney Franziskus Lepionka. Hon. Jennifer S.D. Roberts, Presiding
  13. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Peter B Morin, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Michael William Ford, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Ryan M Gazda, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Franziskus Lepionka, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Megan B Bayer, Esq. [email protected]
  14. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Early Intervention Event held. Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D.
  15. Scheduled Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Event: Summary Judgment Hearing VIA ZOOM Date: 03/26/2024 Time: 02:00 PM Email notice to: Attorney Michael W. Ford; Attorney Peter B. Morin; Attorney Ryan M. Gazda; Attorney Megan B. Bayer; and Attorney Franziskus Lepionka.
  16. Answer of City of Cambridge, filed.
  17. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed.
  18. Plaintiffs' Memorandum In Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, filed.
  19. Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts, filed.
  20. Summary Judgment Appendix, filed.
  21. Agreed-To Motion for Extension of Time (up to and including November 13, 2023 for City of Cambridge to serve and file a response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment), filed.
  22. Agreed-To Motion for Extension of Time (up to and including November 13, 2023 for City of Cambridge to serve and file a response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment) ALLOWED. Email notice to: Attorney Michael W. Ford; Attorney Peter B. Morin; Attorney Ryan M. Gazda; Attorney Megan B. Bayer; and Attorney Franziskus Lepionka. Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Peter B Morin, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Michael William Ford, Esq. [email protected] Plaintiff: Ryan M Gazda, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Franziskus Lepionka, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Megan B Bayer, Esq. [email protected]
  23. City of Cambridge's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment In Favor of Plaintiffs and Request for Entry of Summary Judgment In Favor of Defendant, filed.
  24. City of Cambridge's Brief In Support of Its Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment In Favor of Plaintiffs and Request for Entry of Summary Judgment In Favor of Defendant, filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more